#12914 closed enhancement (fixed)
Discourage contributors to use operator=RFF and operator=ERDF in France
| Reported by: | francois.lacombe | Owned by: | Don-vip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 16.12 |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | tested |
| Keywords: | validator, tags, operator, local | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Hi,
Both RFF and ERDF companies have changed their identity recently or in 2015.
As infrastructure operators, the map currently contains dozen objects with operator=RFF and operator=ERDF spread in the whole metropolitan French country.
As abbreviations, it's not correct to discourage their use all around the world.
But it may be possible to create a validation rule to warn users about objects with those 2 values located in France ?
French relation : http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2202162
Correct values are :
operator=RFF => operator=SNCF Réseau
operator=ERDF => operator=Enedis
Keep up with good work guys ;)
Attachments (1)
Change History (24)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
| Component: | Core → Core validator |
|---|---|
| Version: | → tested |
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | validator tags operator local added |
follow-up: 6 comment:3 by , 9 years ago
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
| Type: | defect → enhancement |
|---|
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Replying to Klumbumbus:
limit the area of validation rules
There was already a short discussion in another ticket whose number I don't remember.
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
On the other hand, I think this special case is a good candidate for a (previously in the french community discussed) automated edit.
(area limited validation rules would still be nice to have though)
comment:9 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | → 16.07 |
|---|
comment:10 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | 16.07 → 16.08 |
|---|
comment:11 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | 16.08 → 16.09 |
|---|
comment:12 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | 16.09 → 16.10 |
|---|
comment:14 by , 9 years ago
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
comment:16 by , 9 years ago
One of the validator rules is actually obsolete meanwhile. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator=RFF is used only once. 
by , 9 years ago
| Attachment: | taghistory.png added |
|---|
follow-up: 18 comment:17 by , 9 years ago
The tag had been conscientiously replaced by the current value by knowledgable mappers.
The rule can be edited like 'RFF used to be French national railway operator. Be sure you know what you are doing'.
This value may not be used anymore for railway operation in France.
Question : where did you get this awesome graph of tag usage ? Is taginfo producing it on a daily basis ?
comment:18 by , 9 years ago
Replying to francois.lacombe:
Question : where did you get this awesome graph of tag usage ? Is taginfo producing it on a daily basis ?
It's a new tool, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TagHistory
Very interesting examples at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Math1985/diary/39404 Also visualizes the influence of JOSM Presets/Validator on tagging.
comment:22 by , 8 years ago
Hi Vincent,
Right on time to close 2016 en a very positive release :)
Happy New Year and thank you for all that good work!
François
It is not yet possible to limit the area of validation rules. For now you could add "France-specific rules" similar to the others at Rules