#16147 closed enhancement (fixed)
Pressurised waterway preset
| Reported by: | francois.lacombe | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 18.06 |
| Component: | Internal preset | Version: | |
| Keywords: | waterway, pressurised, tunnel, pipeline | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Recently, waterway=pressurised was reviewed on osm wiki, encouraging the use of waterway=* key to map not only free space but pipe flow waterway features also.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dpressurised
Waterway presets should be updated and get new entries as follow :
==Penstock==
waterway=pressurisedman_made=pipelinesubstance=waterlocation={underground,overground}usage=penstockname=*operator=*diameter=*material=*
==Pipe flow tunnel==
- waterway=pressurised
- usage={headrace,tailrace,transmission,irrigation}
- location=underground
- tunnel=flooded
- name=*
- operator=*
==Canal preset should be updated as follow==
tunnel={culvert,flooded}usage={transportation,transmission,irrigation,headrace,tailrace}
Main validation rules :
usage=penstockrequiresman_made=pipelineandwaterway=pressurisedtunnel=yesandwaterway=pressurisedrequiresman_made=pipelinetunnel=floodedis highly improbable withman_made=pipelinewaterway=canalshouldn't be used withtunnel=yeswaterway=pressurisedrequirestunnel=floodedorman_made=pipeline
Render I'd suggest :
waterway=pressurised+tunnel=*=> add grey 1px casing to existing waterway linewaterway=pressurised+man_made=pipeline=> add "pipeline color" 1px casing to existing waterway line
I know it's huge and you may have a lot of undergoing business, it would be great to handle this
Let me know if I can help or provide more precise things
Attachments (0)
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | → 18.06 |
|---|
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
I would if I could find where to go to get preset translations.
Note that transmission substations are tagged with substation=transmission and not usage=transmission
Anyway I don't know if it has any impact yet
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
One more thing :
I've just noticed there is an existing usage key validation rule called 'missing attribute - usage=* without railway=*'
It should be extended to waterways if possible
comment:8 by , 8 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|



In 13895/josm: