Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#9708 closed enhancement (duplicate)
building=public is suggested by JOSM but not good mapping
| Reported by: | dieterdreist | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Internal preset | Version: | |
| Keywords: | building public | Cc: |
Description
JOSM suggests building=public but this is not consistent with the wiki description for the tag building ("public" is hardly a building type). I suggest to remove this value from the list of suggested tags (autocompletion).
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
this is not a tag which was ever discussed, it is not consistent with the general definition of building=* and if JOSM wasn't pusing this there would probably be much fewer use.
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
| Component: | Core → Internal preset |
|---|---|
| Priority: | normal → minor |
| Type: | defect → enhancement |
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Closed as duplicate of #8978.



Neither osmwiki:Tag:building%3Dpublic or osmwiki:Key:building mention this tag as depercated.
amenity=public_buildingis not recommended, butbuilding=publicis OK if the correctamenityis set, too.