Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#8007 closed defect (fixed)
Conflict between plugins ColumbusCVS and opendata (see also ticket 7920)
| Reported by: | meppen7 | Owned by: | OliverW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Plugin columbuscsv | Version: | latest |
| Keywords: | Pluginplugin, columbuscvs, opendata | Cc: | OliverW, Frankl2009 |
Description (last modified by )
When both plugins - columbuscvs and opendata are loaded - the problem described with ticket #7920 appears. In addition a window named -Projection method - pops up, where you can select different projections. Deactivating the plugin opendata solves the problem.
Attachments (0)
Change History (16)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 12 years ago
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
Oliver, are you ok to implement the same safeguard mechanism in colombusCSV plugin ?
comment:7 by , 12 years ago
| Component: | Plugin → Plugin columbuscsv |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from to |
| Status: | assigned → new |
great :)
comment:9 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:11 by , 12 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
Replying to oliverw:
Fixed in [o29179].
Did not fix it and version is only manually installable as version in manifest is wrong. See comment:9:ticket:7920.
comment:12 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
follow-up: 14 comment:13 by , 12 years ago
Launched JOSM on a different computer and it updated to 29178 without problems. So I cannot reproduce your update problem, sorry.
Regarding the opendata conflict - could you provide a test file, please?
follow-up: 15 comment:14 by , 12 years ago
Replying to OliverW:
Launched JOSM on a different computer and it updated to 29178 without problems. So I cannot reproduce your update problem, sorry.
Regarding the opendata conflict - could you provide a test file, please?
Sorry, I did not test it and was irritated by the version and the duplicate. Why is it 29178 and not 29179 ? What was the purpose of [o29179] ?
follow-up: 16 comment:15 by , 12 years ago
Replying to skyper:
Why is it 29178 and not 29179 ? What was the purpose of [o29179] ?
The jar version and the checkin always differ by at least 1. It is not possible to distribute the jar file with the same checkin as used for the build.
comment:16 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Replying to stoecker:
Replying to skyper:
Why is it 29178 and not 29179 ? What was the purpose of [o29179] ?
The jar version and the checkin always differ by at least 1. It is not possible to distribute the jar file with the same checkin as used for the build.
Sorry, for the confusion. Still do not understand the version in manifest of [o29179].
This is because both plugins register the
.csvfile extension, and JOSM is not currently able to deal with this situation.Two possible solutions:
If 2 is possible, it is better for users.