Modify ↓
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#7120 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Check: Railway end node near other railway
| Reported by: | Owned by: | team | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
| Keywords: | unconnected_way railway | Cc: | GerdP |
Description
There allready exists a "Way end node near other highway" check. The same would be very helpful to improve the quality of railway data.
Some false positives may be avoidable if the code would also check for the tag "railway:buffer_stop" in the end node.
Attachments (0)
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
| Component: | Core → Core validator |
|---|
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
| Keywords: | unconnected_way added |
|---|
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
| Keywords: | railway added |
|---|
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
I think #18272 fixes this. Please open a new ticket if further issues are found
comment:9 by , 4 years ago
| Resolution: | duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:10 by , 4 years ago
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.



i realized that there is allready some support of this. But i think the current implementation needs some changes:
in org/openstreetmap/josm/data/validation/tests/UnconnectedWays.java:
The default distance (mindist) of 10 meters is not useful for checking railways. I my experiments, something like 1-2 meters is best. So should there be a mindist_highway and mindist_railway?
The code finds some false positives: many platforms are still tagged "railway=platform" instead of "public_transport=platform". In member function "visit", ways tagged with railway=platform should not be taken into account:
something like