Modify ↓
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 20 months ago
#7120 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Check: Railway end node near other railway
Reported by: | Owned by: | team | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | unconnected_way railway | Cc: | GerdP |
Description
There allready exists a "Way end node near other highway" check. The same would be very helpful to improve the quality of railway data.
Some false positives may be avoidable if the code would also check for the tag "railway:buffer_stop" in the end node.
Attachments (0)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
Component: | Core → Core validator |
---|
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
Keywords: | unconnected_way added |
---|
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
Keywords: | railway added |
---|
comment:7 Changed 20 months ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I think #18272 fixes this. Please open a new ticket if further issues are found
comment:9 Changed 20 months ago by
Resolution: | duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:10 Changed 20 months ago by
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
i realized that there is allready some support of this. But i think the current implementation needs some changes:
in org/openstreetmap/josm/data/validation/tests/UnconnectedWays.java:
The default distance (mindist) of 10 meters is not useful for checking railways. I my experiments, something like 1-2 meters is best. So should there be a mindist_highway and mindist_railway?
The code finds some false positives: many platforms are still tagged "railway=platform" instead of "public_transport=platform". In member function "visit", ways tagged with railway=platform should not be taken into account:
something like