Opened 14 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#6793 closed defect (worksforme)
JOSM creating nodes at 0,0
| Reported by: | rasher | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Core | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | simon04, bastiK, skyper |
Description (last modified by )
I regularly load the area around 0,0 to see if any junk has ended up there. Lately (since a few weeks) it appears that JOSM will sometimes, under some condition create nodes at 0,0 while the user is editing a completely different area.
An example here, where the nodes were even part of a way, but usually they are just untagged and unused nodes:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/128992905/history
This is not the most helpful bug report I've ever created, I'll admit. I guess it's possible that it is somehow user error but if it is, maybe the validator should scream bloody murder if the user tries to create anything at 0,0?
Attachments (0)
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Some time ago there was a discussion about that topic in the de-forum (german only):
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=11178
Back in April the problem was still around, e. g. changeset 7880161.
I'm not sure if it's really just a "josm only"-problem.
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
Still a problem: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20047152 contains a node created at (0,0)
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:6 by , 2 years ago
| Resolution: | → worksforme |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
I don't think this is still a problem, except by people who add a new node via the Add node... dialog and ignore the Object at Position warning.



Sounds reasonable, there could also be a warning for very long way segments.