Allow tracktype for parkings

[mkoniecz]

What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. Tag amenity=parking tracktype=grade2 object
2. run validator

What is the expected result?

No complaints

What happens instead?

tracktype without highway (1)

Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.

I would consider it as a valid tagging

​https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118311571

URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2018-10-28 22:27:31 +0100 (Sun, 28 Oct 2018)
Build-Date:2018-10-28 21:33:32
Revision:14382
Relative:URL: ^/trunk

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (14382 en) Linux Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
Memory Usage: 734 MB / 869 MB (215 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.8.0_191-b12, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
Screen: :0.0 1920x1080
Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1080
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Plugins:
+ OpeningHoursEditor (34535)
+ buildings_tools (34572)
+ continuosDownload (82)
+ imagery_offset_db (34641)
+ measurement (34529)
+ reverter (34552)
+ todo (30306)

Last errors/warnings:
- W: No configuration settings found.  Using hardcoded default values for all pools.

[Klumbumbus]

​https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=tracktype#combinations
99.95% of the 5,790,859 tracktype=* tags are used on highway=*. Only 94 objects on amenity=*.
The wiki talks about tracktype=* on highway=* only too.

[mkoniecz]

Is it wontfix because this tracktype tag should be deleted? Or is it wontfixed because goal of JOSM validator is not to eliminate all false positives but all popular false positives?

[Klumbumbus]

It is true that the goal is not eleminate all extremely rare false positives in the validator. However in this case I don't call it a false positive. The tag should be removed from the object in my opinion. Wiki and actual usage are in sync (which is often not so clear like in this case) that tracktype=* should be used on highway=*.