Opened 10 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#11256 closed enhancement (duplicate)
better check for crossing highways and waterways
Reported by: | skyper | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | crossing layer bridge tunnel | Cc: |
Description
Atm validator only checks for layer=*
for crossing highways and waterways. This leads to bad tagging as you get validator quiet by simply adding a layer tag to one of the crossing ways.
- we need a check for
bridge=*
ortunnel=*
both with value but not "no". - we need better wording of current layer check and exclude
layer=0
.
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Replying to Penegal:
That problem also bothers me; when the
waterway
has atunnel
tag, or when thehighway
has abridge
orford
tag, and, in both cases, this value is notno
, the validator shouldn't complain IMHO.
No, we need at least one layer=*
and one tunnel/bridge
=* where layer=0
and tunnel/bridge=no
do not count.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Closed as duplicate of #9819.
That problem also bothers me; when the
waterway
has atunnel
tag, or when thehighway
has abridge
orford
tag, and, in both cases, this value is notno
, the validator shouldn't complain IMHO.