Opened 11 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#11256 closed enhancement (duplicate)
better check for crossing highways and waterways
| Reported by: | skyper | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
| Keywords: | crossing layer bridge tunnel | Cc: |
Description
Atm validator only checks for layer=* for crossing highways and waterways. This leads to bad tagging as you get validator quiet by simply adding a layer tag to one of the crossing ways.
- we need a check for
bridge=*ortunnel=*both with value but not "no". - we need better wording of current layer check and exclude
layer=0.
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Replying to Penegal:
That problem also bothers me; when the
waterwayhas atunneltag, or when thehighwayhas abridgeorfordtag, and, in both cases, this value is notno, the validator shouldn't complain IMHO.
No, we need at least one layer=* and one tunnel/bridge=* where layer=0 and tunnel/bridge=no do not count.
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Closed as duplicate of #9819.



That problem also bothers me; when the
waterwayhas atunneltag, or when thehighwayhas abridgeorfordtag, and, in both cases, this value is notno, the validator shouldn't complain IMHO.