Multiple associatedStreet relations

[Polyglot]

Hi,

I get this message in the validator: Multiple associatedStreet relations

When I check it out, this concerns a street which continues from one municipality into the next, keeping the same name. It seems logical to me those streets actually belong in 2 different aS relations.

Polyglot

[Don-vip]

can you please give me a link to this street?

[Polyglot]

This is 1 example:

​https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1490437
​https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2599890

This is another:

​https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257820379

These streets form the border between two municipalities. The houses on 1 side are in 1 municipality, on the other side in another.

Jo

[skyper]

+1

There should be only a note and no warning if one or more additional tags are different. Have similar problems with different post codes in one street. In my case even a parent relation could make sense.

[Don-vip]

In 7947/josm:

fix #10945 - allow several associatedStreet relations if they share the same name

[skyper]

Now, I do not get a warning about more than one relation with identical tags but different members anymore.

Terracer did produce many of these relations and I would be happy about a warning but no warning for relations which have exactly the same keys but one or more different values like different postal code.

[Don-vip]

In 7986/josm:

fix #10945 - restore warning at INFO level when relations all have the same name