Validation tests for foot/footway/sidewalk

[naoliv]

First a problem: validating a way with highway=footway + foot=no gives us a footway used with foot= (note that there isn't a value after the =)

Now the enhancements: highway=residential + sidewalk=both + foot=no doesn't issue a warning (it's as contradictory as using highway=footway + foot=no)

Also, highway=residential + footway=both doesn't warn that footway is deprecated (and that sidewalk should be used instead) done.

[Klumbumbus]

with highway=foot you mean highway=footway?

[naoliv]

Replying to Klumbumbus:

with highway=foot you mean highway=footway?

Yes, sorry :-)
Also, sidewalk=both (on second paragraph) can be both|left|right|yes and footway=both (third paragraph) can be both|left|right

[Klumbumbus]

typos

[Klumbumbus]

Replying to naoliv:

First a problem: validating a way with highway=footway + foot=no gives us a footway used with foot= (note that there isn't a value after the =)

In this case we could fix this by simply changing !? to =no in trunk/data/validator/highway.mapcss#L67, but I made a ticket for this, see #10859

[Klumbumbus]

Replying to naoliv:

Now the enhancements: highway=residential + sidewalk=both + foot=no doesn't issue a warning

It seems some people tag this way when the sidewalks are mapped as separate ways, however I'm not sure if this is good tagging.
Example: ​way/220407308.
In this case should the sidewalk key set to no or be removed?

Overpass turbo querry: ​http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6yN

[Klumbumbus]

In 7814/josm:

see #10851 - add validator rules for footway=*