#9651 closed enhancement (fixed)
Validade landuse=* on nodes
Reported by: | naoliv | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 14.02 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
landuse should be used to describe the usage of an area.
Its wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse) also says that it should be used only in areas.
I see a lot of people wrongly using a single node with landuse=residential, for example (one example using South America: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ku)
Could JOSM give a warning about using landuse on nodes?
/* needs a better phrase :-) */ node[landuse] { throwWarning: tr("{0} should be used only in areas", "{0.key}"); }
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Milestone: | → 14.02 |
---|
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 11 years ago
This could be used on a point if the mapper didn't know where the area spans. He could just mark node that around the node there was landuse=x to unknown span.
So is the intended workflow to just mark some guessed area, tag it landuse=* and source=guess or something?
I do agree with the patch here, I just want to cover all usecases.
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
Replying to aceman:
This could be used on a point if the mapper didn't know where the area spans. He could just mark node that around the node there was landuse=x to unknown span.
Yes, sure (I saw some people tagging landuse=farm on a node here, probably to say that the place is a farm).
Maybe to play safe, it could be demoted to informational level, like "highway without reference". A highway could have no ref at all, but the message still informs the user to verify the data.
In 6790/josm: