#9407 closed enhancement (fixed)
[PATCH] Add Hungarian EOV projection and GRS67 ellipsoid
Reported by: | BathoryPeter | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 13.12 |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | Cc: | bastiK |
Description (last modified by )
Additionally I've enabled ClarkeIGN in Projections.java and corrected flattening parameter of Bessel ellipsoid.
Hungarian HD72 / EOV proj4 parameters are from here: http://mercator.elte.hu/~saman/hu/okt/ol/
because of http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/23700/ writes a bad one.
Attachments (2)
Change History (17)
by , 11 years ago
Attachment: | hungarian_EOV_projection.diff added |
---|
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | [PATCH] Added Hungarian EOV projection and GRS67 ellipsoid → [PATCH] Add Hungarian EOV projection and GRS67 ellipsoid |
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Replying to simon04:
bastiK, any concerns with applying this patch? I'd add a note in
data/epsg
that the parameters originate from http://mercator.elte.hu/~saman/hu/okt/ol/.
Good idea, but how can we add note to epsg file? As I can see "#" marks the name of projection.
follow-up: 6 comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Putting the note in the SVN commit message would be OK for me.
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Replying to Don-vip:
Putting the note in the SVN commit message would be OK for me.
Sorry, forgot to put it in the commit message, but hopefully whoever needs to know will find this ticket.
Replying to simon04:
bastiK, any concerns with applying this patch?
It's fine, but I removed the "+datum=HD72
" property because it is redundant and not defined anywhere. In addition I reverted the change to Bessel1841 as no reason or source was given.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
The changed value for Bessel 1841 is written on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_ellipsoid, but no source is given on that page neither.
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
Milestone: | → 13.12 (6502) |
---|
by , 11 years ago
Attachment: | hd72-eov_correction.diff added |
---|
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
- Corrected HD72 > WGS84 conversion based on a newer publication: G. Molnár–G. Timár, "Determination of the parameters of the abridged Molodensky formulae providing the best horizontal fit" (http://www.fomi.hu/honlap/magyar/szaklap/2004/04/2.pdf)
- More precise GRS67 flattening parameter (source: epsg.org)
follow-up: 11 comment:10 by , 11 years ago
This site seems to have Bursa-Wolf parameters with better maximum error. It references a publication by the same authors.
follow-up: 14 comment:11 by , 11 years ago
Replying to bastiK:
You are right, Bursa-Wolf parameters are exist for HD72.
As biggest GIS softwares (Postgis, QGIS, Proj4) uses 3-parameter form (with corrected parameters), for better interoperability, Hungarian OSM community suggest to use the same definition.
comment:14 by , 11 years ago
Replying to BathoryPeter:
As biggest GIS softwares (Postgis, QGIS, Proj4) uses 3-parameter form (with corrected parameters), for better interoperability, Hungarian OSM community suggest to use the same definition.
Sounds reasonable.
bastiK, any concerns with applying this patch? I'd add a note in
data/epsg
that the parameters originate from http://mercator.elte.hu/~saman/hu/okt/ol/.