Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#7339 closed defect (fixed)
When deleteing a way, if it's in a relation, the position numbers don't match
Reported by: | rickmastfan67 | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
When doing some license change cleanup, I had to recently delete a way because it was completely tainted. When I did that, since it was part of a relation, I got the message asking me to confirm that I wanted to delete it from the relation. When that message showed up, I noticed that the "Position" number for the way inside of the relation didn't match in the popup window and in the properties.
I've attached a screenshot showing this.
This problem is easy to duplicate (as long as there is more than 2 ways/nodes in said relation). Every time, the position numbers are off by 1.
Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn Build-Date: 2012-01-30 02:32:23 Last Changed Author: stoecker Revision: 4878 Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Last Changed Date: 2012-01-30 00:02:54 +0100 (Mon, 30 Jan 2012) Last Changed Rev: 4878 Identification: JOSM/1.5 (4878 en) Memory Usage: 397 MB / 2730 MB (218 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.6.0_30, Sun Microsystems Inc., Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Operating system: Windows 7 Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugin: OpeningHoursEditor (27355) Plugin: buildings_tools (27598) Plugin: imageryadjust (27540) Plugin: licensechange (27472) Plugin: mapdust (27355) Plugin: measurement (27289) Plugin: openstreetbugs (27355) Plugin: reverter (27604) Plugin: turnrestrictions (27355) Plugin: undelete (27395) Plugin: utilsplugin2 (27624)
Attachments (1)
Change History (3)
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | ticket_7339.png added |
---|
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
In [4879/josm]: