#7044 closed defect (fixed)
still strange warnings about wrong object type with role=house (WAS: Do not warn about relations with role=house as member of associatedStreet)
Reported by: | skyper | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | associatedStreet relation house | Cc: |
Description
Please do not warn about relations with role=house as member of associatedStreet. I have several occasions where I need to add multip.-relations as members:
- houses with holes
- areas
Thanks
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Sorry, but I still get warnings about wrong type for label=house and I can not figure out the elements.
- First I thought maybe incomplete members -> downloading all members did not change anything.
- Then I checked on the the addr:interpolation, but I get three warnings and there are only two ways taged as addr:interpolation in attached relation.
cu skyper
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
Keywords: | house added |
---|---|
Summary: | Do not warn about relations with role=house as member of associatedStreet → still strange warnings about wrong object type with role=house (WAS: Do not warn about relations with role=house as member of associatedStreet) |
title update
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 13 years ago
Oh, I see it was the interpolation, propably it was just to late/early yesterday.
Maybe a info would be nice for unclosed ways.
P.S.: the "Street" relation still warns about relations.
follow-up: 10 comment:9 by , 13 years ago
Replying to skyper:
Oh, I see it was the interpolation, propably it was just to late/early yesterday.
Do address interpolations belong to such a relation? If yes, then let's stick to the current implementation.
Maybe a info would be nice for unclosed ways.
This cannot be implemented easily.
P.S.: the "Street" relation still warns about relations.
Relations are not allowed according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Street
comment:10 by , 13 years ago
Replying to simon04:
Replying to skyper:
Oh, I see it was the interpolation, propably it was just to late/early yesterday.
Do address interpolations belong to such a relation? If yes, then let's stick to the current implementation.
They are both parts of the Karlruhe Scheme and belong together.
Maybe a info would be nice for unclosed ways.
This cannot be implemented easily.
That's sad.
Is it easier to check for the key addr:interpolation on unclosed ways, otherwise this check is useless for associatedStreet !
P.S.: the "Street" relation still warns about relations.
Relations are not allowed according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Street
I do not use this type but please tell me, how should I add a building with a hole to this relation type ?
Maybe it is missing on the wiki.
Cheers
Closed as duplicate of #5218.