#6741 closed enhancement (fixed)
[Patch] Improve Advanced Object Info
| Reported by: | simon04 | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Core | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
I adapted the Advanced Object Info dialog to increase readability. The output is very similar to http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/.
Any comments?
Attachments (3)
Change History (14)
by , 14 years ago
| Attachment: | 6741.patch added |
|---|
by , 14 years ago
| Attachment: | inspect.png added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 14 years ago
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
So something like s="modified"; add(tr(s)); does not work.
It must be "s=marktr("modified"); add(tr(s));" :-)
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 14 years ago
Replying to bastiK:
- Why remove the sorting of the primitives?
I worked on this patch before your commit. I have no strong opinion on this point. When sticking to the order of selection (w/o sorting), it gives more control to the user.
I'll adapt the patch to reflect your suggestions. Better committing after the stabilization phase?
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Replying to simon04:
Replying to bastiK:
- Why remove the sorting of the primitives?
I worked on this patch before your commit. I have no strong opinion on this point. When sticking to the order of selection (w/o sorting), it gives more control to the user.
The selection comes from a HashSet, so order is randomized.
Better committing after the stabilization phase?
Yes, unless you feel strongly about getting it into next tested.
by , 14 years ago
| Attachment: | 6741.v2.patch added |
|---|
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
I integrated your comments from above … I assume that I can commit this patch after the stabilization phase.
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Sure, go ahead.
Maybe we can improve display of conflicts?
Node: 739410997
State: modified
Data Set: 2c390c
Edited at: 2011-09-06T10:15:06Z
Edited by: alv (4660)
Version: 3
In changeset: 9225884
Tags:
"capacity"="9"
"description"="pyöräteline"
"amenity"="bicycle_parking"
Coordinates: 60.2195182, 25.0042714
Coordinates (projected): 2783462.7599048135, 8448774.202314496
In conflict with:
Node: 739410997
State: modified
Data Set: 1f3b536
Edited at: 2011-09-06T10:15:06Z
Edited by: alv (4660)
Version: 3
In changeset: 9225884
Tags:
"capacity"="8"
"description"="pyöräteline"
"amenity"="bicycle_parking"
Coordinates: 60.21942278701698, 25.00446350188961
Coordinates (projected): 2783484.1445893454, 8448752.817629961
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 14 years ago
Replying to bastiK:
Maybe we can improve display of conflicts?
Of course, what do you suggest? Probably In conflict with Node: 739410997 (cf. your example)?
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
comment:10 by , 14 years ago
Minor stuff:
- Would be nice, to display number of nodes / members, for ways and relations.
- For way nodes, you don't need the prefix
Node:in each line. - Role should be in quotes.




Looks better, IMHO.
Minor things:
s="modified"; add(tr(s));does not work.