#3306 closed defect (fixed)
[PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation
Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | dmuecke |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation. More (in german) see here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=4438
Attachments (5)
Change History (27)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
Owner: | changed from team to dmuecke |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
Summary: | Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation → [PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation |
---|
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
Signs looking odd. I would expect to see no left turn signs rather.
comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by
The patch isn't integrated in version 1998?
I have no Compiler for testing the patch.
-- Dennis
comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by
I'm not happy with the current patch. First I do not like disabling the icon and second I think the patch is not exactly how it should be (I can't describe better ATM).
comment:8 Changed 14 years ago by
Okay, that right too. Thanks. I am a little confused, because I ha've read over the word "suppress" yesterday... ;)
comment:9 Changed 14 years ago by
Summary: | [PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation → Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation |
---|
After taking a nap I think I know what to change. The place on the map where u-turn restriction signs were drawn is wrong.
I'm going to fix it when I'm back from holiday.
comment:10 Changed 14 years ago by
Summary: | Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation → [PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation |
---|
Issue fixed, patch attached!
comment:11 Changed 14 years ago by
Some minor things: The "oneway" check needs to use the OsmUtils to check for "true" value. Also could you please add all the relevant test and error cases in data/restriction.osm, so we have a reproducable test-file.
comment:12 Changed 14 years ago by
File uploaded. When you change the orientation of the oneway, you see the problem. (The postion of the icon is changes and the other restriction is marked with an "*")
Changed 14 years ago by
Attachment: | no_u_turn.png added |
---|
comment:13 Changed 14 years ago by
Sorry when I was unclear. During your coding you have thought about all correct and wrong cases (at least I hope so :-). In data directory there is a file restriction.osm which is a test-file for this. Please add all possible cases there (correct ones as well as faulty ones), so the correctness of the display can be verified anytime in future.
Changed 14 years ago by
Changed 14 years ago by
Attachment: | test_restriction.osm added |
---|
comment:15 Changed 14 years ago by
I've removed restriction.osm from patch file and added it as separate file called test_restriction.osm. Diff did create far too much differences making it pointless for code review.
comment:16 Changed 14 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:17 Changed 14 years ago by
Applied. Sorry, not much of your patch survived the changes I did.
comment:18 Changed 14 years ago by
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
No probs!
Look at E15! It shows no u turn sign wrongly.
comment:21 Changed 14 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Don't know why, but you mixed "oneway=-1". Your error example is actually correct. Reversed way and -1 is the same is correctway and oneway=yes.
Regarding E13 - Display of symbols is not suppressed when the to way is affected, as this way is not required for positioning ATM. This is a strict separation between draw as best as possible and validator. I know there may be other opinions, but it is a choice done also for multipolygons and we must be consistent.
So also in the future the fact "is displayed" does still not mean "is correct". We anyway do not check all possible errors in the display routine.
JOSM does suppress now drawing u-turn sign if via isn't a node and doesn't mark it an error any longer. Attached patch should fix the issue.