Adding more validation errors for areas

[etienne.julien@…]

Just wanted to report that OSM Inspector for Areas returns in some cases a different and more complete set of validation errors (overlaps, roles missing, ...).

More info ​https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/looking-for-a-tool-that-can-identify-broken-forest-bounds/9043/6

[skyper]

You are talking about multipolygon relations, right?
There are already several warnings about multipolygon relations therefore, please, attach some small examples and tell us what you expect to be warned about. Thanks

[anonymous]

Yes multipolygon relations.

e.g Relation 13113130

JOSM shows 1 error:

• role for 1075732657 should be outerway

OSMI shows 2 errors:

• node 9383789576 touching ring
• node 1059812214 in multiple rings

e.g relation 13113129

OSMI shows additionally 1 error:

• node 957957244 in multiple rings

These node-touching-rings errors are important since they may not be rendered properly

[anonymous]

Link to relations above:

​https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=98.59846&lat=19.11412&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

​https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=98.44125&lat=19.68707&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

[skyper]

r13113130

[skyper]

Well, a single touching node might be valid and I already get some informational warnings (need to be enabled in preferences):

• Multipolygon rings share node (6)
• With the currently used mappaint style the style for outer way mismatches the area style (1)

EDIT: this is with the attached r13113130.

[skyper]

Replying to anonymous:

Yes multipolygon relations.

e.g Relation 13113130

JOSM shows 1 error:

• role for 1075732657 should be outerway

OSMI shows 2 errors:

• node 9383789576 touching ring
• node 1059812214 in multiple rings

e.g relation 13113129

OSMI shows additionally 1 error:

• node 957957244 in multiple rings

These node-touching-rings errors are important since they may not be rendered properly

I do not find n957957244 in r13113129 and n1059812214 in r1075732657.

[skyper]

I have just recheck and the only problem with current ​r13113129 is marked as error: Role verification problem - Role for '‎residential (landuse)‎ (11 nodes) [id: 291 359 096]‌' should be 'outer' (1)
Similar is true for the attached r13113130​. In my eyes, all problems are mentioned at least as informational warnings.

@etienne.julien:
Do you find any problem not found by validator? If so, please, mention the object ids, thanks