include socket:type2_cable in default preset

[Hedaja]

There have been discussions on how to tag typ2 car charging sockets that have a fixed cable for while now.
​https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=775442#p775442
​https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station#charging_cable_availability
​https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-June/053394.html

The latest solution the people could agree on was tagging such stations as socket:typ2_cable. The wiki has been adjusted and I made the necessary changes to the defaultpresets.xml. See attached file

[skyper]

Please, only attach .diff or .patch and not the whole file, see Patch Guidelines. Thanks

[Hedaja]

I haven't used a versioning system like that yet, so I hope the created patch file is correct.

Thanks
Christian

[Klumbumbus]

Replying to Hedaja:

The latest solution the people could agree on was tagging such stations as socket:typ2_cable.

In non of the links you provided I find a single support for that tag suggestion. Also so far there is only 1 object tagged with socket:type2_cable ​https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2_cable

[Hedaja]

Replying to Klumbumbus:

Replying to Hedaja:

The latest solution the people could agree on was tagging such stations as socket:typ2_cable.

In non of the links you provided I find a single support for that tag suggestion. Also so far there is only 1 object tagged with socket:type2_cable ​https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2_cable

Yes. So far there is no solution that has any meaningful number of uses (above 10 objects). Lately it was mainly discussed in a Telegram group (​https://t.me/openchargemap) and then brought forth on the mailing list. the suggestion is in here (yes could have been more obvious(​https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-June/053421.html)
The reason that I'm bringing this up is that it has been a long standing issue which is going to get rising attention. The socket:type2_ cable solution was chosen (by the few interested) because it doesn't hurt the old tagging scheme (like plug:* would) and simply adds a distinction between cable and no cable for this specific case (type1 might also have the same issue but that's not clear yet.)

I understand if you think this is gonna need more discussion beforehand though.

[Klumbumbus]

Replying to Hedaja:

the suggestion is in here (yes could have been more obvious(​https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-June/053421.html)

I saw this post but after this there was only one reply and this didn't comment on the tag.
I see the need for a more specific tagging (with cable vs. without cable) but I think it needs more discussion. Maybe create a proposal. This usually gets attention by more mappers.
Wontfix for now.

[Klumbumbus]

(see also wiki:/DevelopersGuide/DefaultPresets)

[Hedaja]

In the last 13 months, the tag socket:type2_cable has been adopted well by the community and is documented in the wiki now.
All examples provided on the charging station wiki page have been adjusted as well.
I hope it qualifies to be added to the main preset now.
​https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/socket:type2_cable
​https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
​https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station