Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#19094 closed enhancement
Informational warning about "placement:forward/backward=transition" — at Initial Version
| Reported by: | skyper | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 20.07 |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
| Keywords: | lanes-tagging placement transition | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Have a way with
placement:forward/backward=transition - Run validator
What is the expected result?
A informational warning suggesting to use placement=transition
What happens instead?
No informational warning
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
There is no need to use forward/backward with transition but it does not really harm. Still tagging scheme would be more consistent if only placement=transition would be used.
Relative:URL: ^/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2020-04-13 22:05:56 +0200 (Mon, 13 Apr 2020) Revision:16294 Build-Date:2020-04-14 01:30:47 URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
