[Patch] Request: Add (motor_)vehicle combo to highway=path preset

[AnkEric]

In Closed ticket https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/18642 you have also implemented:
"Add vehicle combo to highway=track preset"
Oké, nice! Appreciated. I get more than I have asked for.

But than I would like to suggest to not only Add vehicle combo to highway=track, but also (and - imo - even more important) to highway=path preset.

Most annoying (to me) a highway=path is added on OSM without any access restriction.
Therefore (default access): bicycle/mofa/moped=yes is implied. Sometimes this is correct, sometimes not. So my GPS might be directing me - on bicycle - over a path which is in fact a "footway".
Sometimes this is "resolved" the wrong - IMO - way: [highway=path] + [access=no] + [foot=yes].
Because this is "less work" than [highway=path] + [bicycle=no] + [moped=no] + [mofa=no] + [horse=no] and better than [highway=path] + [bicycle=no] ?
Next mapper might change to: [highway=footway] + [access=no] + [foot=yes].
Next mapper might change to: [highway=footway] + [access=no] (since "foot=yes" is "needless").
And now we have a path with no access at all.
Which was "resolved" by Reverting ALL thousands of footways in the Netherlands where "foot=yes" was removed by hundreds of "Undiscussed Mechanical Edits".
And now JOSM Validator is is bothering me with tens of warnings for each of my Changesets: "unnecessary tag - foot=yes|designated is unnecessary for highway=footway|pedestrian".
JOSM Validator is - of course - correct. Does [highway=footway] + [foot=no] exist in "on the ground"? No! IMO!
And I don't dare to resolve; -))

Correct would have been initial mapping as: [highway=path] + [vehicle=no].
And a JOSM preset might help... a little...

/ AnkEric

[skyper]

vehicle=* plus motor_vehicle=* should be added. Additionally, the link to "road restriction"-preset is nice, too.

Some transport modes from path are missing in "road restriction"-preset, namely:

• wheelchair=*
• ski=*
• snowmobile=*

Considering splitting the "road restriction"-preset into two parts by extracting the transport modes into an own preset and adding links between both, is another idea.

[AnkEric]

Thanks Skyper for your Additions.

Except for [tracktype=grade<x>] and [agricultural=*], what is (should be) different for path and track presets? Track preset is very complete, use (almost) the same preset for path as being similar?

[skyper]

Please, find attached patch file​) which adds missing access keys to "Road Restriction" preset and adds preset links from path to the "Road Restriction" preset.

[skyper]

patch

[skyper]

version 2 with values_sort="false"

[skyper]

I had forgotten to add values_sort="false". Please, find updated patch version 2​.

[skyper]

To solve #17750 it would be nice to split the access part of into a new preset "Access Restrictions" and have preset links between these two presets.

[skyper]

version 3 adding more access tags to highway=*way and path

[skyper]

I did even add more tags to highway=path and highway=bridle/cycle/footway and add labels about implied tags, see version 3​

Next step, would be to split the "Road Restrictions" preset and use little more chunks.

[Klumbumbus]

In 16742/josm:

see #18698 - add more access tags (patch by skyper, modified)

[Klumbumbus]

In 16743/josm:

fix #18698 - split Road Restrictions preset in Road Restrictions and Access Restrictions

[skyper]

Replying to Klumbumbus:

In 16743/josm:

fix #18698 - split Road Restrictions preset in Road Restrictions and Access Restrictions

Thanks now I can work on #17750.

[Klumbumbus]

OK, please don't go wild with chunks :)

The patch header works fine now.

[skyper]

Replying to Klumbumbus:

OK, please don't go wild with chunks :)

Yeah, will stay calm, like the one above.

The patch header works fine now.

Thanks, for the respond.

[Klumbumbus]

In 16749/josm:

see #18698 - remove new tags from ignore list

[Klumbumbus]

Ticket #17960 has been marked as a duplicate of this ticket.