Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#17796 closed defect
don't warn about addr:housenumber without number when snc in Italy — at Version 10
| Reported by: | francians | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
| Keywords: | template_report housenumber italy | Cc: | dieterdreist |
Description (last modified by )
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- create a node
- set addr:housenumber=snc
What is the expected result?
No error in Italy
What happens instead?
Gives warning
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
I suggest this change in mapcss:
*[addr:housenumber=snc][inside("IT")] { set ok_housenumber; }
Please see:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/15144/josm
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2019-06-03 00:05:30 +0200 (Mon, 03 Jun 2019)
Build-Date:2019-06-02 22:10:24
Revision:15155
Relative:URL: ^/trunk
Identification: JOSM/1.5 (15155 it) Linux Antergos Linux
Memory Usage: 1225 MB / 3541 MB (499 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.8.0_181-b13, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
Screen: :0.0 1920x1080
Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1080
Dataset consistency test: No problems found
Plugins:
+ OpeningHoursEditor (34977)
+ PicLayer (35030)
+ buildings_tools (34982)
+ turnrestrictions (34977)
+ utilsplugin2 (34977)
Tagging presets:
+ ${HOME}/JOSM/miopreset.xml
Validator rules:
+ https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/SuspiciousSwimming_Pool&zip=1
+ ${HOME}/JOSM/MyRules.validator.mapcss
Last errors/warnings:
- W: No configuration settings found. Using hardcoded default values for all pools.
- E: Errore nella inizializzazione del test MapCSSTagChecker:
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
| Component: | Core → Core validator |
|---|
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
| Summary: | warn about addr:housenumber without number when snc in Italy → don't warn about addr:housenumber without number when snc in Italy |
|---|
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:5 by , 7 years ago
IMHO it is not ok, because „no housenumber“ is not a housenumber. I have made a proposal for nohousenumber=yes for these cases, but it is relatively new. I can confirm that people commonly use „snc“ when no housenumber has been assigned (it literally means no housenumber = senza numero civico).
comment:6 by , 7 years ago
We discussed similar cases "S/N" and "bb" before in #17486. For "S/N" we still warn but we excluded "bb" in Bosnia Herzegovina as it is used there in official documents. If "snc" is not used in official documents by the government in Italy I would too keep the warning for "snc" because then it is much likely "tagging for the QA tool".
comment:7 by , 7 years ago
„official documents“ is very vague, I am sure there are many snc in official documents, but it doesn’t make it a housenumber. There may also be a habit to add the term into housenumber fields in forms, but again, this is just a shortcoming of those forms and not a sign that this would be a housenumber. The nohousenumber in analogy to noname=yes is a defined representation of the fact that no housenumber has been assigned. What would you say if people added “no streetname” into addr:street? I encourage you to rethink your decision on the Bosnian case as well.
comment:8 by , 7 years ago
osmose Devs agreed about this change request too:
https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/commit/30df15ba73d3144c0f03a2dc0151890616a09d48
It is common in industrial areas
comment:9 by , 7 years ago
| Keywords: | housenumber italy added |
|---|
comment:10 by , 7 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|



snc means "without number? Is it agreed in the italian osm community to use this tag for such houses? Is it documented somewhere?