Opened 23 months ago
Last modified 20 months ago
#17770 new enhancement
deprecate service=irrigation/transportation/water_power?
Reported by: | Don-vip | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | usage service waterway irrigation | Cc: | Klumbumbus |
Description
osmwiki:Tag:service=irrigation is used more than 10.000 times.
But we define in presets osmwiki:Tag:usage=irrigation, used 6.000 times.
I guess we should deprecate service
for waterways and promote usage
instead?
Attachments (0)
Change History (16)
comment:1 Changed 23 months ago by
Milestone: | 19.05 → 19.06 |
---|
comment:2 Changed 23 months ago by
comment:3 follow-up: 5 Changed 23 months ago by
I know, that's why I asked the question :) Time to start a discussion on @tagging then?
comment:4 Changed 23 months ago by
(the French community is also upset about iD governance by the way)
comment:5 Changed 23 months ago by
Replying to Don-vip:
Time to start a discussion on @tagging then?
Yes would make sense, however I have no urge for that :)
Meanwhile we could add the 3 service tags to the ignore list to silence jenkins.
comment:6 Changed 23 months ago by
Fine for me. I can ask François to start the discussion, I feel he's a bit responsible for the appearance of usage
in 2018.
comment:7 Changed 23 months ago by
Cc: | flacombe added |
---|
comment:8 Changed 23 months ago by
Let's go on @Tagging for a simple question
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-June/045904.html
comment:9 Changed 23 months ago by
Cc: | flacombe removed |
---|
comment:11 Changed 22 months ago by
According to @tagging, service=* is a poor choice to deal with waterway purpose.
Discussion will go on particular point about waterway=pressurised, but reviewed and documented tagging ig done with usage=*
comment:12 Changed 22 months ago by
Milestone: | 19.06 → 19.07 |
---|
comment:15 Changed 20 months ago by
Milestone: | 19.08 |
---|
comment:16 Changed 20 months ago by
Not a frankly consensus
According to wiki, I'll go for usage and drop service for waterways
I usually avoid marking tags as deprecated in JOSM when they are not marked as deprecated in the wiki.
Pretty much ignoring the wiki at its presets and validation rules is one of the biggest points of critisism of the iD editor lately among the german osm community. (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65004 https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66308)