Modify ↓
Opened 4 years ago
Closed 9 months ago
#17092 closed defect (fixed)
Warning with adjacent government offices and corporate offices
Reported by: | LeTopographeFou | Owned by: | LeTopographeFou |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | template_report overlap way | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Load Node 6129288820 and all features it belongs to (ways, relations...)
- See that this node is at the corner between one government office (office=government) and one company office (office=company)
- See that those offices shared a common part of their outlines (but that there are no intersection or overlap)
- Launch 'Validate' in the validation panel
What is the expected result?
There should be no error (at least not the one described in this issue)
What happens instead?
There is an error stating that those offices overlapped
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
I think this is a false positive and that it is totally ok to have such situation.
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2018-11-28 01:09:01 +0100 (Wed, 28 Nov 2018) Build-Date:2018-11-28 00:26:41 Revision:14460 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (14460 fr) Windows 10 64-Bit OS Build number: Windows 10 Home 1803 (17134) Memory Usage: 247 MB / 989 MB (104 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_181-b13, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM Screen: \Display0 1600x1200 Maximum Screen Size: 1600x1200 Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: + Mapillary (v1.5.17) + PicLayer (34544) + apache-commons (34506) + apache-http (34632) + cadastre-fr (34711) + contourmerge (v0.1.3) + ejml (34389) + geotools (34513) + jna (34633) + jogl (1.2.2) + jts (34524) + log4j (34527) + measurement (34529) + pt_assistant (2.1.10) + public_transport (34548) + tag2link (34690) + tageditor (34560) + turnlanes-tagging (272) + turnrestrictions (34643) + utilsplugin2 (34506) Map paint styles: + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes&zip=1 Last errors/warnings: - W: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file - W: PluginException: : org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.PluginException: Fichier jar invalide '<josm.pref>\plugins\jna.jar.new' - W: Impossible dʼanalyser le fichier 'jna.jar.new' pour les informations du greffon. Abandon. - W: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file - W: PluginException: : org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.PluginException: Fichier jar invalide '<josm.pref>\plugins\jna.jar.new' - W: Impossible dʼanalyser le fichier 'jna.jar.new' pour les informations du greffon. Abandon. - W: Invalid jar file ''<josm.pref>\plugins\pt_assistant.jar.new'' (exists: false, canRead: false) - W: Impossible dʼinstaller le greffon '<josm.pref>\plugins\jna.jar' depuis le fichier temporaire téléchargé '<josm.pref>\plugins\jna.jar.new'. error in opening zip file: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file - W: No configuration settings found. Using hardcoded default values for all pools.
Attachments (1)
Change History (4)
Changed 4 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by
Keywords: | overlap way added |
---|
comment:2 Changed 9 months ago by
Owner: | changed from team to LeTopographeFou |
---|---|
Status: | new → needinfo |
comment:3 Changed 9 months ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | needinfo → closed |
I tested with 18543 and the error is no longer there, I changed this ticket to Fixed, thanks.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
It seems this was fixed sometime in the last 4 years. Can someone still reproduce this behavior (with the attached osm file)?