Modify ↓
#16432 closed defect (fixed)
Exclude names differing by roman numerals in Similarly named ways check
Reported by: | mkoniecz | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 18.06 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | template_report roman number | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Validate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408615666 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408615667
What is the expected result?
No complaints about names.
What happens instead?
Complaints about names that should not cause problems, names differing by numbers or roman numerals are normal and should not be considered suspicious.
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2018-06-24 19:57:43 +0200 (Sun, 24 Jun 2018) Build-Date:2018-06-24 18:08:53 Revision:13974 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (13974 en) Linux Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS Memory Usage: 955 MB / 955 MB (217 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_171-b11, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Screen: :0.0 1920x1080 Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1080 Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: + OpeningHoursEditor (34095) + buildings_tools (34212) + continuosDownload (1529090613) + imagery_offset_db (34337) + reverter (34271) + todo (30304) Last errors/warnings: - W: No configuration settings found. Using hardcoded default values for all pools. - E: Skipping to the next rule, because of an error: - E: org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.mappaint.mapcss.parsergen.ParseException: Encountered " <IDENT> "way "" at line 222, column 1.
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
Keywords: | roman number added |
---|
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | → 18.06 |
---|
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
Thanks for maintaining the best OSM validator (mostly because you keep fixing reported false positives)!
comment:5 by , 7 years ago
Thanks for reporting reproducible and clearly described issues. This makes the whole thing easier!
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
In 13980/josm: