#13949 closed enhancement (fixed)
add 2016 Orthophotos City Bern - WMS or TMS?
Reported by: | Klumbumbus | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 16.12 |
Component: | Core imagery | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
What is the preferred method if WMS and TMS exists for the same source? I guess TMS since the tiles are already rendered?
see http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2016-November/003868.html
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
First I'd suggest to add both with the mirror argument. I did prefer TMS in the main entry (JOSM does not yet use the mirror really) when both is offered by the same source. For these proxy style TMS I did always prefer the original WMS.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I used tms as first and the wms as mirror, because wms is extremely slow for me, most tiles don't load at all. Also despite EPSG:4326 is specified in the wms URL, it doesn't work.
TMS is prefered over WMS as it generates less load on server and though it should be faster.
Though TMS is limited to Mercator projection.