Modify ↓
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#12406 closed defect (duplicate)
java.awt.AWTError: BoxLayout can't be shared
Reported by: | kolesar | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | template_report | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Create a new layer (Ctrl+N)
- Draw a way with 3 nodes.
- Create a new relation, make new way as a member, save relation.
- Split the way at the middle point.
- Combine the two ways.
Attached .osm file with steps 1-4 ready. You only need to combine the two ways to reproduce bug.
What is the expected result?
Ways to be combined.
What happens instead?
Exception: java.awt.AWTError: BoxLayout can't be shared
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
Used latest .jar file downloaded from website. Tested version does not have this bug. Started JOSM with empty preferences, no plugins.
URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2016-01-20 01:28:07 +0100 (Wed, 20 Jan 2016) Build-Date:2016-01-20 02:32:45 Revision:9547 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (9547 hu) Linux Ubuntu 15.10 Memory Usage: 281 MB / 672 MB (91 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_66-b17, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM Dataset consistency test: No problems found Last errors/warnings: - E: java.awt.AWTError: BoxLayout can't be shared java.awt.AWTError: BoxLayout can't be shared at javax.swing.BoxLayout.checkContainer(BoxLayout.java:465) at javax.swing.BoxLayout.invalidateLayout(BoxLayout.java:249) at javax.swing.BoxLayout.addLayoutComponent(BoxLayout.java:282) at java.awt.Container.addImpl(Container.java:1127) at java.awt.Container.add(Container.java:417) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.RelationMemberConflictResolver.build(RelationMemberConflictResolver.java:67) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.RelationMemberConflictResolver.<init>(RelationMemberConflictResolver.java:120) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.buildRelationMemberConflictResolverPanel(CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.java:185) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.build(CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.java:173) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.<init>(CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.java:221) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog$1.run(CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.java:102) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.util.GuiHelper.runInEDTAndWait(GuiHelper.java:110) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.getInstance(CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.java:100) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.launchIfNecessary(CombinePrimitiveResolverDialog.java:504) at org.openstreetmap.josm.actions.CombineWayAction.combineWaysWorker(CombineWayAction.java:183) at org.openstreetmap.josm.actions.CombineWayAction.actionPerformed(CombineWayAction.java:222) at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.notifyAction(SwingUtilities.java:1663) at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBinding(JComponent.java:2882) at javax.swing.KeyboardManager.fireBinding(KeyboardManager.java:307) at javax.swing.KeyboardManager.fireKeyboardAction(KeyboardManager.java:263) at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBindingsForAllComponents(JComponent.java:2974) at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBindings(JComponent.java:2966) at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyEvent(JComponent.java:2845) at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:6312) at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2236) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4891) at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2294) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4713) at java.awt.KeyboardFocusManager.redispatchEvent(KeyboardFocusManager.java:1954) at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchKeyEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:806) at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.preDispatchKeyEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:1074) at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.typeAheadAssertions(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:945) at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:771) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4762) at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2294) at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:2750) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4713) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:758) at java.awt.EventQueue.access$500(EventQueue.java:97) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:709) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:703) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:86) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:731) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:729) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:728) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:201) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:116) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:105) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:101) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:93) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:82)
Attachments (1)
Change History (2)
by , 9 years ago
Attachment: | BoxLayoutBug.osm added |
---|
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Closed as duplicate of #12405.
Update: relation not needed. Combining ways is enough. Duplicate of #12405 that was submitted while I was typing this ticket.