#11484 closed enhancement (fixed)
Should group "missing name" validation results
Reported by: | naoliv | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 15.05 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The "missing name" test isn't grouping all its problems inside one category (since the name is being used in the info message):
Shouldn't the name be excluded from the message?
JOSM
Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn Build-Date: 2015-05-26 01:31:54 Last Changed Author: Don-vip Revision: 8426 Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Relative URL: ^/trunk URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Last Changed Date: 2015-05-26 01:37:50 +0200 (Tue, 26 May 2015) Last Changed Rev: 8426 Identification: JOSM/1.5 (8426 pt_BR) Linux Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Memory Usage: 1010 MB / 10206 MB (521 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.7.0_75, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Java package: openjdk-7-jre:amd64-7u75-2.5.4-2 VM arguments: [-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on] Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: - Create_grid_of_ways (30892) - OpeningHoursEditor (30962) - PicLayer (31114) - SimplifyArea (30962) - buildings_tools (31120) - conflation (0.1.7) - contourmerge (1013) - download_along (30892) - editgpx (30892) - geotools (31068) - importvec (30892) - jts (31002) - log4j (30892) - measurement (30892) - merge-overlap (30988) - opendata (31116) - pbf (31010) - pdfimport (30892) - poly (31056) - reverter (31120) - scripting (30710) - todo (29154) - turnrestrictions (31034) - undelete (30892) - utilsplugin2 (31153)
Attachments (0)
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
kind of a regression of r8239.
I think the individual name after name:*=
helps to better understand the error message.
Are there real use cases where you get a lot of these errors, or was the screenshot created with a overpass extract which specialized on these error types?
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Both are real with what I work (but maybe I am not a good example of a JOSM user, since usually I work with big areas or a lot of data).
Sorting them could help a lot (#11072; I usually see the Missing name
and Very long segment
messages inserted between the other warnings) or, if possible, could they be displayed in another level?
For example:
Warnings |_ Something A |_ Something B |_ Very long segments |_ segment of 10 kilometers |_ segment of 15 kilometers |_ segment of XX kilometers |_ Something C |_ Missing names |_ add tag with correct language key in name:*=Foo |_ add tag with correct language key in name:*=Bar |_ …
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | → 15.05 |
---|---|
Type: | defect → enhancement |
The same for
Very long segment of XX kilometers