Opened 10 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#11081 closed enhancement (wontfix)
Base signs and additional signs
Reported by: | Polyglot | Owned by: | bastiK |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Plugin roadsigns | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Sometimes additional signs have different effects, which depend on the base signs they refer to.
For instance a bicycles_only sign under an access_prohibited sign means the access restrictions change.
But when placed under a parking sign, it means amenity=bicycle_parking, whereas a parking sign on its own does't automatically signifies amenity=parking...
I added a remark in the help file, that the user needs to remove the tags which don't apply, but it's easy to overlook that.
Jo
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
B1+M1 are two small form factor signs placed next to cycle paths in Belgium where the cyclist has to yield, sometimes to other cylists coming from the left or right.
I don't encounter B9+M1 very often, but in essence it's the same, a cycle path parallel with a priority road, so cyclists also have right of way on the smaller streets joining it.
C3 shouldn't get get M1, that's indeed C11.
It often gets M2 or M3 though. access=no, bicycle=yes
but when C1 gets excepted for bicycles with a M2 it becomes:
oneway=yes, oneway:bicycle=no
Jo
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I understand this one: E9a + M1 =
amenity=bicycle_parking
.But what is the other example? A combination of C3 + M1 would be C11.
And B1/B9 + M1 - I'm not familiar with this in Germany, what kind of traffic situation is it?