| 1 | | Replying to [comment:24 Gabe Reichenberger <v-garei@…>]: |
| 2 | | > Replying to [comment:23 Gabe Reichenberger <v-garei@…>]: |
| 3 | | > > Replying to [comment:22 skyper]: |
| 4 | | > > > * high-/rail-/waterway with `layer` but no `bridge` or `tunnel` (probably few more keys) should be warned about, in general. |
| 5 | | > > |
| 6 | | > > This patch should cover this scenario and has been moderately tested in each scenario (highway/waterway/railway) |
| 7 | | > |
| 8 | | > |
| 9 | | > [https://josm.openstreetmap.de/attachment/ticket/9819/9819_highway_waterway_railway.patch This patch] should cover this scenario and has been moderately tested in each scenario (highway/waterway/railway) |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | I WISH WE COULD EDIT COMMENTS! Sorry for the comment explosion, just wanted to make sure the link was understandable. |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | [https://josm.openstreetmap.de/attachment/ticket/9819/9819_highway_waterway_railway.patch 9819_highway_waterway_railway.patch] should cover this scenario and has been moderately tested in each scenario (highway/waterway/railway) |
| | 1 | ''deleted'' |
