Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #9245


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-10-31T06:27:54+01:00 (12 years ago)
Author:
mkoniecz
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #9245 – Description

    initial v1  
    11Detection would be very similar to http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9141 - but with "node that may be left by foo in at least two directions" replaced by "node that may be left by foo in at least one direction" (crossing terminating footway/cycleway sometimes happen, also some people may stop mapping feature at this point).
    22
    3 And obviously
    4 "Any node with ((A or B) AND C AND without highway=crossing AND without crossing=no) should be reported as "highway=crossing or crossing=no is probably missing"."
    5 
    6 replaced by
     3And main check would be:
    74
    85" Any node with ((without foot access AND without bicycle access) OR (without road) AND (with highway=crossing OR with crossing=no) should be reported as "highway=crossing or crossing=no is probably not needed here"."