conflicts on nodes about parent way after revert

[skyper]

Since of

What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. open attached file​
2. select all objects
3. revert selection from changeset 16833418.

What is the expected result?

To get real conflicts see #8947.

What happens instead?

The three conflicts are all about having a parent way or not and not at all conflicts. The real conflicts are not shown.

Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.

Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn
Build-Date: 2013-08-08 01:35:22
Last Changed Author: Don-vip
Revision: 6117
Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Last Changed Date: 2013-08-07 22:11:35 +0200 (Wed, 07 Aug 2013)
Last Changed Rev: 6117

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (6117 en) Linux Debian GNU/Linux 7.1 (wheezy)
Memory Usage: 216 MB / 672 MB (52 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.7.0_25, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
Java package: openjdk-7-jre:amd64-7u25-2.3.10-1~deb7u1
Program arguments: [$HOME/rev.osm]
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Plugin: OpeningHoursEditor (29778)
Plugin: conflation (0.1.6)
Plugin: jts (29613)
Plugin: mirrored_download (29753)
Plugin: notes (0.3)
Plugin: openstreetbugs (29435)
Plugin: reverter (29771)
Plugin: undelete (29555)
Plugin: utilsplugin2 (29771)
Plugin: wikipedia (29778)

[GerdP]

I cannot reproduce with JOSM r17084 and reverter (35579). Can this be closed?

[skyper]

Not sure what to do, as this ticket can be closed but on the other hand I would have to reopen #8947.

I get no conflicts at all but there should be conflicts or am I wrong:

1. open attached file​ (Layer A)
2. select all objects
3. revert selection from changeset 16833418.
   • no conflicts
4. duplicate layer A (-> Layer B)
5. update data of layer A
   • 28 conflicts (13 ways, 15 nodes)
6. download the area​ (Layer C)
7. merge layer B on layer C
   • no conflicts and no object is modified. Changes of layer B are silently dropped.

I would expect the conflicts after the revert or at least when merging the reverted layer on up-to-date data.

Relative:URL: ^/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2020-10-25 17:07:27 +0100 (Sun, 25 Oct 2020)
Revision:17265
Build-Date:2020-10-26 02:30:48
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk

Plugins:
+ reverter (35579)

[GerdP]

Yes, step 3 should produce conflicts.

[skyper]

Replying to GerdP:

Yes, step 3 should produce conflicts.

Should I open a new ticket and we close this one?

[GerdP]

In fact I am not sure if the current behaviour is wanted or not. There is no code in reverter that would download the current version of an object. I think it was different in the past. So yes, please open a new ticket.

[skyper]

See #20006 for the new ticket. This one is fixed then.

[skyper]

data of today