Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #6633


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-07-24T16:36:40+02:00 (15 years ago)
Author:
pinkduck
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #6633 – Description

    initial v1  
    44org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.conflict.tags.TagConflictResolver.showTagsWithMultiValuesOnly=true
    55
    6 See the attached Demonstrator.osm file for a particular arrangement where trying to combine three ways into a closed way building shape results in a dialog stating 'No conflicts to resolve'.
     6See the attached Demonstration.osm file for a particular arrangement where trying to combine three ways into a closed way building shape results in a dialogue stating 'No conflicts to resolve'.
    77
    88Way 1: building=yes
     
    1010Way 3: untagged
    1111
    12 I do not believe the 'No conflicts to resolve' dialog should be shown in this case. If the separate ways with building=yes are combined first and then combined with the remaining untagged way the dialog is not shown, so what is special about the 3-way case?
     12I do not believe the 'No conflicts to resolve' dialogue should be shown in this case. If the separate ways with building=yes are combined first and then combined with the remaining untagged way the dialogue is not shown, so what is special about the 3-way case?
    1313
    14 It is quite a nuisance to have to dismiss this dialog hundreds of times when splitting and rejoining building outlines into individual addresses.
     14It is quite a nuisance to have to dismiss this dialogue hundreds of times when splitting and rejoining building outlines into individual addresses.