Opened 20 months ago
Last modified 20 months ago
#23503 new defect
DataIntegrityProblemException when split way is member of a route relation
Reported by: | GerdP | Owned by: | KiaaTiX |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Plugin polygoncutout | Version: | |
Keywords: | template_report | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- load attached file
- select highway inside forest
- perform "Split polygon" (note that this deletes the highway without modifying the route relation)
- delete route relation
- undo
What is the expected result?
in step 3: either refuse to split or don't delete the highway
What happens instead?
highway is deleted, relation is corrupted (which is demonstrated by the further steps)
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
Similar to #23502, but here the split way is member of a relation.
Revision:18988 Is-Local-Build:true Build-Date:2024-02-19 09:17:14 Identification: JOSM/1.5 (18988 SVN en) Windows 10 64-Bit OS Build number: Windows 10 Pro 2009 (19045) Memory Usage: 219 MB / 1888 MB (65 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 17.0.5+8, Eclipse Adoptium, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Look and Feel: com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsLookAndFeel Screen: \Display0 1920×1080 (scaling 1.00×1.00) Maximum Screen Size: 1920×1080 Best cursor sizes: 16×16→32×32, 32×32→32×32 System property file.encoding: UTF-8 System property sun.jnu.encoding: Cp1252 Locale info: en_DE Numbers with default locale: 1234567890 -> 1234567890 VM arguments: [-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,suspend=y,address=localhost:59602, -ea, --add-exports=java.base/sun.security.action=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-exports=java.desktop/com.sun.imageio.plugins.jpeg=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-exports=java.desktop/com.sun.imageio.spi=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.base/java.io=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.base/java.text=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.base/jdk.internal.loader=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.desktop/java.awt=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.desktop/javax.swing.text.html=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-opens=java.prefs/java.util.prefs=ALL-UNNAMED, --add-modules=java.scripting,java.sql, -javaagent:D:\eclipse-java-2020-09\eclipse\configuration\org.eclipse.osgi\3245\0\.cp\lib\javaagent-shaded.jar, -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8, -Dstdout.encoding=UTF-8, -Dstderr.encoding=UTF-8] Dataset consistency test: [DELETED REFERENCED] {Relation id=-161 version=0 MVT [way -1428, way -1454, way -1455]} refers to deleted primitive {Way id=-1454 version=0 MVDT nodes=[]} Plugins: + OpeningHoursEditor (36196) + PolygonCutOut (v0.7.3) + RoadSigns (36196) + apache-commons (36176) + buildings_tools (36200) + comfort0 (36200) + o5m (36126) + pbf (36176) + poly (36126) + reverter (36196) + undelete (36126) + utilsplugin2 (36200) Validator rules: + d:\java_tools\JOSM\mygeometry.mapcss + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/GermanySpecific&zip=1 + c:\josm\core\resources\data\validator\geometry.mapcss Last errors/warnings: - 00000.424 W: extended font config - overriding 'filename.Myanmar_Text=mmrtext.ttf' with 'MMRTEXT.TTF' - 00000.427 W: extended font config - overriding 'filename.Mongolian_Baiti=monbaiti.ttf' with 'MONBAITI.TTF' - 02271.854 E: Handled by bug report queue: org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.DataIntegrityProblemException: Deleted member referenced: {Relation id=-109 version=0 MVT [way -1319]} (changed by the following commands: [Sequence: Create building], [Add relation site (0, 1 member) [id: -109]], [Sequence: Split Polygon]) - 02382.866 E: Handled by bug report queue: org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.DataIntegrityProblemException: Deleted member referenced: {Relation id=-109 version=0 MVT [way -1319]} (changed by the following commands: [Sequence: Create building], [Add relation site (0, 1 member) [id: -109]], [Sequence: Split Polygon]) - 03827.133 E: Handled by bug report queue: org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.DataIntegrityProblemException: Deleted member referenced: {Relation id=-161 version=0 MVT [way -1428, way -1454, way -1455]} (changed by the following commands: [Add relation route (0, 3 members) [id: -161]], [Sequence: Split way unclassified (highway) (4 nodes) [id: -1.428] into 3 parts], [Sequence: Split Polygon]) === REPORTED CRASH DATA === BugReportExceptionHandler#handleException: No data collected. Warning issued by: BugReportExceptionHandler#handleException === STACK TRACE === Thread: AWT-EventQueue-0 (26) of main org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.DataIntegrityProblemException: Deleted member referenced: {Relation id=-161 version=0 MVT [way -1428, way -1454, way -1455]} (changed by the following commands: [Add relation route (0, 3 members) [id: -161]], [Sequence: Split way unclassified (highway) (4 nodes) [id: -1.428] into 3 parts], [Sequence: Split Polygon]) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.Relation.checkMembers(Relation.java:501) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.Relation.fireMembersChanged(Relation.java:513) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.Relation.setMembers(Relation.java:61) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.Relation.load(Relation.java:283) at org.openstreetmap.josm.command.DeleteCommand.lambda$1(DeleteCommand.java:233) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.osm.DataSet.update(DataSet.java:1065) at org.openstreetmap.josm.command.DeleteCommand.undoCommand(DeleteCommand.java:227) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.UndoRedoHandler.lambda$0(UndoRedoHandler.java:381) at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.util.GuiHelper.runInEDTAndWait(GuiHelper.java:225) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.UndoRedoHandler.undo(UndoRedoHandler.java:372) at org.openstreetmap.josm.data.UndoRedoHandler.undo(UndoRedoHandler.java:362) at org.openstreetmap.josm.actions.UndoAction.actionPerformed(UndoAction.java:39) at java.desktop/javax.swing.SwingUtilities.notifyAction(SwingUtilities.java:1810) at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBinding(JComponent.java:2947) at java.desktop/javax.swing.KeyboardManager.fireBinding(KeyboardManager.java:311) at java.desktop/javax.swing.KeyboardManager.fireKeyboardAction(KeyboardManager.java:266) at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBindingsForAllComponents(JComponent.java:3040) at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyBindings(JComponent.java:3032) at java.desktop/javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyEvent(JComponent.java:2909) at java.desktop/java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:6403) at java.desktop/java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2266) at java.desktop/java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:5001) at java.desktop/java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2324) at java.desktop/java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4833) at java.desktop/java.awt.KeyboardFocusManager.redispatchEvent(KeyboardFocusManager.java:1952) at java.desktop/java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchKeyEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:883) at java.desktop/java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.preDispatchKeyEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:1150) at java.desktop/java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.typeAheadAssertions(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:1020) at java.desktop/java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchEvent(DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.java:848) at java.desktop/java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4882) at java.desktop/java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2324) at java.desktop/java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:2780) at java.desktop/java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4833) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:773) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:722) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:716) at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399) at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:86) at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:97) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$5.run(EventQueue.java:746) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$5.run(EventQueue.java:744) at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399) at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:86) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:743) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:203) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:124) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:113) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:109) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:101) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:90)
Attachments (1)
Change History (12)
by , 20 months ago
Attachment: | bad-split-2.osm added |
---|
comment:1 by , 20 months ago
reported on github: https://github.com/bdxd111/JOSM-Polygon-Cut-Out/issues/12
comment:2 by , 20 months ago
Component: | Plugin → Plugin polygoncut |
---|
comment:3 by , 20 months ago
Why does Trac call it polygoncut
when the jar is PolygonCutOut.jar and the wiki also says PolygonCutOut
?
comment:5 by , 20 months ago
The name has changed now but I think team
is wrong. The plugin is not in svn.
comment:7 by , 20 months ago
OK, let's see if something happens on github. I tried to compile the sources but failed as the build requires git
.
comment:8 by , 20 months ago
Replying to taylor.smock:
I don't have a good user here on Trac for the plugin.
In these cases we used the email in the past (if openly available).
follow-up: 10 comment:9 by , 20 months ago
Does author information from git
commit messages count as "openly available" for that purpose? I assume so.
comment:10 by , 20 months ago
Replying to taylor.smock:
Does author information from
git
commit messages count as "openly available" for that purpose? I assume so.
I think so. That's similar security level as Trac. Not obvious, but can be extracted.
comment:11 by , 20 months ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
split way is member of route relation