Improper warning for aerialway=zip_line (Issue #2068) [osm-fr/osmose-backend]

[hugo.amann@…]

Hello,
Forwarding my OSMOSE Issue ​#2068:
(item/class 9001001
missing tag usage without railway or waterway)

In order to stop this warning, they should change

way[usage][!railway][!waterway][route!=railway][man_made!=pipeline] {

to

way[usage][!railway][!waterway][route!=railway][man_made!=pipeline][!aerialway] {

In addition, although the use of usage=* is documented on the wikis of Key:aerialway, Tag:aerialway=zip_line and several others for many years with the intention to deprecate the unspecific tag aerialway=goods, it is not documented on the wiki of Key:usage itself

Thanks!
Hugo Amann

[taylor.smock]

Please update the ​osmwiki:Key:usage page. It looks like ​osmwiki:Tag:usage=industrial and ​osmwiki:Tag:usage=tourism are the two usage tags I would expect on aerialways. ​osmwiki:Tag:usage=freight seems to be a duplication of the meaning for ​osmwiki:Tag:usage=industrial.

I'll revisit this once the wiki pages have been stable for awhile.

[stoecker]

Milestone closed.

[taylor.smock]

Ticket retargeted after milestone closed

[taylor.smock]

In 19165/josm:

Fix #23298: Improper warning for aerialway=zip_line

Exclude aerialway from combinations check and add usage values to aerialway
presets (where someone has already used the key with the aerialway tag).

[SimonPoole]

This change seems a bit problematic.

I could get over that the combination of aerialway with usage is undocumented and only occurs ~200 times, but shouldn't it be a multiselect and include a value for normal aka non-touristic transportation of people?

[taylor.smock]

You might want to double check the undocumented bit -- see ​osmwiki:Key:usage#Aerialways .

Of specific note for my purposes, it has been documented there for >6 months. Maybe I shouldn't have added it to the presets, but I figured I might as well if I was going to add an exception to the validator rules.