Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 8 months ago
#22349 new enhancement
layout for boundary=aboriginal_lands
| Reported by: | Federico Explorador | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Internal mappaint style | Version: | |
| Keywords: | template_report boundary aboriginal_lands | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- In JOSM, tag a closed way or polygon as boundary=aboriginal_lands
What is the expected result?
the way should have a layout (a colour, a slightly different to the colour of boundary=administrative )
What happens instead?
The Way looks like a way without any tagging.
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
Please note that in openstreetmap.org, mapnik layer, aboriginal land is already rendered,
see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Daboriginal_lands
or specific case: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/1.4089/-78.3414.
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2022-08-29 16:59:00 +0200 (Mon, 29 Aug 2022) Build-Date:2022-08-30 01:30:57 Revision:18543 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (18543 en_GB) Windows 11 64-Bit OS Build number: Windows 10 Home Single Language 2009 (22000) Memory Usage: 647 MB / 1676 MB (238 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_341-b10, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Look and Feel: com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsLookAndFeel Screen: \Display0 1920×1080 (scaling 1.00×1.00) Maximum Screen Size: 1920×1080 Best cursor sizes: 16×16→32×32, 32×32→32×32 System property file.encoding: Cp1252 System property sun.jnu.encoding: Cp1252 Locale info: en_GB Numbers with default locale: 1234567890 -> 1234567890 Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: + FastDraw (35978) + apache-commons (36003) + buildings_tools (36011) + ejml (35924) + geotools (36015) + jackson (36006) + jaxb (35952) + jts (36004) + measurement (35978) + opendata (36011) + utilsplugin2 (36011) Tagging presets: + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/hiking_routes_with_trail_marking&zip=1 + https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OpenNauticalChart/josm/master/Presets_Hafen.xml + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/Mountains&zip=1 + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/BuildingPreset&zip=1 + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/Healthcare&zip=1 + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/Historical_Objects&zip=1 + https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Sowa1980/Natural_disasters_disasters_danger_preset/master/Natural%20disasters_disasters_danger_preset.zip + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/Irishboundaries&zip=1 + %UserProfile%\GEO\Para edición en JOSM\Presets_Irishboundaries\Presets_Colombianboundaries-preset1.0.xml Last errors/warnings: - 00003.095 W: Unable to request certificate of https://roottest-g3.pkioverheid.nl - 00003.403 W: Unable to request certificate of https://roottest-g3.pkioverheid.nl - 00004.907 E: java.nio.charset.MalformedInputException: Input length = 1 - 00006.027 W: Update plug-ins - You updated your JOSM software. To prevent problems the plug-ins should be updated as well. Update plug-ins now? - 00025.531 E: java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: %UserProfile%\GEO\Para edición en JOSM\Presets_Irishboundaries\Presets_Colombianboundaries-preset1.0.xml - 00025.531 E: %UserProfile%\GEO\Para edición en JOSM\Presets_Irishboundaries\Presets_Colombianboundaries-preset1.0.xml
Attachments (2)
Change History (5)
by , 3 years ago
| Attachment: | aboriginal_lands_in_JOSM_not-selected.jpg added |
|---|
by , 3 years ago
| Attachment: | aboriginal_lands_in_JOSM_selected.jpg added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 3 years ago
| Component: | Core → Internal mappaint style |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | boundary aboriginal_lands added |
comment:2 by , 8 months ago
comment:3 by , 8 months ago
Seems you also don't find it important enough to provide the necessary changes as patch.



Sorry to see that 3 years later, there is no attention, even no comment to this proposal. Aboriginal lands are socially and culturally relevant and should have the same attention than local administrative boundaries or protected areas.