Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #21856, comment 37
- Timestamp:
- 2024-08-19T16:33:36+02:00 (17 months ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #21856, comment 37
initial v1 4 4 5 5 > Also please do not implement any automatic/hidden member sorting (possibly mentioned in comment 8) as that may break correct order of members at other place that the user is touching. iD is notorious for constantly damaging valid route relations with loops. 6 The only thing I was interested in doing with that was sorting ''new'' members (from the split). The previous behavior was not well-defined (IIRC, prior to r18539, the members were out-of-order most of the time). 6 The only thing I was interested in doing with that was sorting ''new'' members (from the split). The previous behavior was not well-defined (IIRC, prior to r18539, the members were out-of-order most of the time for the cases discussed in this ticket). 7 7 8 8 In any case, it turns out that `RelationSorter` doesn't (currently) have the concept of locking the first/last members, so it doesn't work for this particular ticket (it has a tendency to make short loops in cases like this).


