Changes between Version 3 and Version 10 of Ticket #21235
- Timestamp:
- 2021-08-27T18:15:00+02:00 (4 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #21235
- Property Keywords footway sidewalk added
-
Ticket #21235 – Description
v3 v10 3 3 == Issues == 4 4 5 There are t hreeminor issues with the current validation approach I would like to resolve.5 There are two minor issues with the current validation approach I would like to resolve. 6 6 7 7 === `footway=separate` is missing === 8 8 9 9 The validator checks for `left`, `right`, `both`, `none`, and `no`. `separate` is missing from this list. 10 11 === Doesn't treat `no` and `none` equally ===12 13 The validator treats `none` in a different manner as the rest; giving users the suggestion to use `sidewalk=no` instead. Currently the documentation on the wiki and TagInfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sidewalk#values) show that these are now treated as synonyms, with no preference for one or the other. It doesn't seem necessary for JOSM to have a preference one way or another, especially if mappers are simply using what other local mappers do.14 10 15 11 === Whitelist blocks all other possible `footway` values except for three === … … 22 18 23 19 * A check for `footway=separate` is added. 24 * Special treatment for `none` is removed, `none` is added to the general `footway=*` check.25 20 * The whitelist for `footway=*` is removed. 26 21


