#20444 closed enhancement (fixed)
[Patch] Provide an "informal" checkbox in the "path" preset
Reported by: | Owned by: | team | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 21.04 |
Component: | Internal preset | Version: | |
Keywords: | informal path | Cc: |
Description
Openstreetmap data contains many dirt trails that neither are officially created nor maintained. They are also known as desire paths in England. In German they are best called "Trampelpfad". The key is quite old, but only recently the practice of marking paths "informal=yes" has become widespread and certainly many JOSM users are already doing that too.
Would be nice to have that as a check box in the path panel, eg. right after "segregated"?
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/defaultpresets.xml#L1096
Also the autocomplete for adding tags to entities should learn about it.
Attachments (2)
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Component: | Core → Internal preset |
---|---|
Keywords: | informal path added |
by , 4 years ago
Attachment: | josm_20444_informal.patch added |
---|
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Summary: | Provide an "informal" checkbox in the "path" preset → [Patch] Provide an "informal" checkbox in the "path" preset |
---|
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Milestone: | → 21.04 |
---|
comment:6 by , 4 years ago
Mmh, with #20792 fixed we might want to revert part of my patch concerning the chunk:
<chunk id="highway_yesno_incline_oneway_lit_width"> <checkgroup columns="4"> <check key="bridge" text="Bridge" disable_off="true" /> <check key="tunnel" text="Tunnel" disable_off="true" /> <check key="embankment" text="Embankment" disable_off="true" /> <check key="cutting" text="Cutting" disable_off="true" /> <check key="oneway" text="Oneway" /> <check key="lit" text="Lit" /> </checkgroup> <combo key="incline" text="Incline" values="10%,-10%,10°,-10°,up,down" /> <text key="width" text="Width (meters)" /> </chunk>
should display better now instead of two checkgroups.
by , 4 years ago
Attachment: | josm_20444_multirow_checkgroup.patch added |
---|
revert part and use one checkgroup as #20792 was fixed
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
patch adding a check