Add some validator rules (psv:lanes / lanes:psv etc..) access vs lane count information

[anonymous]

I noticed cases when mappers are mixing access information (yes / designated) with numeric (1,2,3,...) amount of lane information

Check please

Used access information when numeric values should be used for keys like:
lanes:psv, lanes:psv:forward, lanes:psv:backward
lanes:bus, lanes:bus:forward, lanes:bus:backward
lanes:hov, lanes:hov:forward, lanes:hov:backward

Used numeric values when access information should be used for keys like:

psv:lanes, psv:lanes:forward, psv:lanes:backward
bus:lanes, bus:lanes:forward, bus:lanes:backward
hov:lanes, hov:lanes:forward, hov:lanes:backward

See also:
​https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv#Possible_mix-up_option
​https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Y1D
​https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv:lanes#Possible_mix-up_option
​https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Y1F

Seems there is no validator messages, recent example changesets:
​https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95719119
​https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95503095

[skyper]

Think, JOSM core simply does not handle lanes:[traffic_mode]. In my eyes, [traffic_mode]:lanes is enough to describe lanes as you can still use yes, designated or official as values to state the designation.

[anonymous]

Replying to skyper:

Think, JOSM core simply does not handle lanes:[traffic_mode].

Ah, okay, then it seems there is no validation needed for this like e.g.lanes:psv=1.

In my eyes, [traffic_mode]:lanes is enough to describe lanes as you can still use yes, designated or official as values to state the designation.

I'm not against to use only [traffic_mode]:lanes, but i would not remove any redundant lanes:[traffic_mode] statements. So, it would be also just nice if JOSM would check at least [traffic_mode]:lanes (e.g. psv:lanes=yes|designated) :-) Or is this already implemented?