Changes between Initial Version and Version 6 of Ticket #19403


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2020-06-21T14:50:57+02:00 (6 years ago)
Author:
simon04
Comment:

Currently, we have

         <role key="" text="route segment" requisite="required" type="way,closedway" member_expression="highway|route=ferry"/>
         <role key="" text="infrastructure" requisite="optional" type="node,closedway" member_expression="tourism OR amenity"/>
         <role key="" text="natural" requisite="optional" type="node,closedway" member_expression="natural=peak OR natural=volcano OR mountain_pass=yes OR natural=water OR tourism=viewpoint OR amenity=drinking_water OR natural=spring OR place=locality"/>
         <role key="guidepost" text="guidepost" requisite="optional" type="node" member_expression="information=guidepost"/>

Guidepost coming from osmwiki:Relation:route#Members

I'm waiting for an update of osmwiki:Tag:route%3Dhiking#Elements_of_a_relation. Currently, too much time for researching the status quo is needed (at least for me).

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #19403

    • Property Component Core validatorInternal preset
  • Ticket #19403 – Description

    initial v6  
    1 Five new roles have been approved for route relations. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles
     1Five new roles have been approved for route relations. See osmwiki:Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles
    22
    3 The roles are: alternative, approach, excursion, connection, main.
     3The roles are: `alternative`, `approach`, `excursion`, `connection`, `main`.
    44No role is the same as main for data users, but the explicit value main is now an approved value.
    55