Opened 9 months ago

Last modified 9 months ago

#19306 new enhancement

Complain about free-floating building:part

Reported by: mkoniecz Owned by: team
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: Core validator Version:
Keywords: template_report Cc:

Description (last modified by mkoniecz)

What steps will reproduce the problem?

  1. Create a closed way
  2. Tag it with building:part=yes
  3. Unselect it
  4. Run validator

What is the expected result?

Validator complains about building:part that is not inside any building area.

What happens instead?


Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.

Triggered by

I suspect that it may be impossible due to performance issues.

Relative:URL: ^/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2020-05-18 09:57:52 +0200 (Mon, 18 May 2020)
Build-Date:2020-05-19 01:30:51

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (16460 en_GB) Linux Ubuntu 19.10
Memory Usage: 263 MB / 976 MB (151 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-2ubuntu219.10, Ubuntu, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
Screen: :0.0 1920x1080
Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1080
Java package: openjdk-11-jre:amd64-11.0.7+10-2ubuntu2~19.10
Java ATK Wrapper package: libatk-wrapper-java:all-0.35.0-3
libcommons-logging-java: libcommons-logging-java:all-1.2-2
fonts-noto: fonts-noto:-
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

+ buildings_tools (35405)
+ measurement (35405)
+ reverter (35409)

Attachments (0)

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed 9 months ago by mkoniecz

Description: modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 9 months ago by mkoniecz

Description: modified (diff)

comment:3 Changed 9 months ago by GerdP

Summary: Compleain about free-floating building:partComplain about free-floating building:part

The wiki (1) seems to allow this when the building:part area is member of a type=building relation?

comment:4 Changed 9 months ago by mkoniecz

requiring type=building anyway indirectly requires building area:

"outline one or more The area that makes up the building outline, e.g. the walls. This outline needs to be tagged with Tag:building=yes or another building value for compatibility with 2D-renderers. "

comment:5 Changed 9 months ago by GerdP

I meant this sentence:
"The building parts can be located in any possible way (inside, outside, intersecting, touching) relative to the building outline in the presence of the type=building relation."

comment:7 Changed 9 months ago by GerdP

What about the sample given in the wiki?
I think the middle is outside.

comment:8 Changed 9 months ago by mkoniecz

I would map it with middle inside. Maybe overhangs would qualify as the intended example? For example a micromapped roof, starting 30cm outside of walls. Or underground extension would qualify?

Still, min_height, building:min_Level location=undeground exceptions should be sufficient to have only valid reports.

Modify Ticket

Change Properties
Set your email in Preferences
as new The owner will remain team.
as The resolution will be set.
to The owner will be changed from team to the specified user.
The owner will change to mkoniecz
as duplicate The resolution will be set to duplicate.The specified ticket will be cross-referenced with this ticket
The owner will be changed from team to anonymous.

Add Comment

E-mail address and name can be saved in the Preferences.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.