Changes between Version 1 and Version 5 of Ticket #19148


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2020-04-24T16:17:14+02:00 (20 months ago)
Author:
skyper
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #19148 – Description

    v1 v5  
    1111 > **This relation is not to be used in cases where the element can be represented by one or more areas and neither linear ways nor nodes outside these areas would have to be included or excluded from within these areas.**
    1212
     13=== Multi_Multi (no warning)
     14Same as "Valid but warning" but with multipolygons for each part. I get no warning.
     15* Should trigger the same warnings as "Valid but warning" cause it is just a different mapping style
     16* Additional warnings for the "forest" multipolygons without `name` as are not needed with only one `outer` without any primary tags
     17
     18=== Wood vs Forest
     19I get `With the currently used mappaint style the style for outer way mismatches the area style (2)`
     20* `wood` and `forest` should be treated as synonyms, e.g. no warning
     21
     22=== Valid but warning
     23I get `Area style on outer way (2)`
     24* Right, but not worse a warning as this is a valid case
     25
     26=== Incorrect
     27I get no warning. This is the result of "create multipolygon". Use the two areas on the right side.
     28* Both areas do not have a primary tag, needs a warning: `Object with only secondary tags`
     29
    1330{{{
    1431Relative:URL: ^/trunk