Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#18944 new enhancement
Extend bus (psv) lane rendering support
| Reported by: | gaben | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | External mappaint style | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | imagic |
Description (last modified by )
"Lane and road attributes" mappaint style offers really good capability with turnlanes-tagging plugin. The only downside I came across, that it currently not supports all widely used bus (psv) lane tagging schemes.
For possible values see the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_lanes
Attachments (0)
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Ah yes, thanks for the info. Then just the support needs to be extended :)
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 6 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → needinfo |
Please, describe what is missing with a small data example file if possible.
follow-up: 6 comment:4 by , 6 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | needinfo → new |
Replying to skyper:
Please, describe what is missing with a small data example file if possible.
If you look at the wiki, you can see that there are 3 different tagging schemes. Namely:
- The busway=* scheme
- The lanes:psv=* scheme
- The bus:lanes=* scheme
Now, in my understanding only the last one is supported, the other two is not.
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Summary: | Add bus (psv) lane rendering → Extend bus (psv) lane rendering support |
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 6 years ago
Replying to gaben:
Replying to skyper:
Please, describe what is missing with a small data example file if possible.
If you look at the wiki, you can see that there are 3 different tagging schemes. Namely:
- The busway=* scheme
- The lanes:psv=* scheme
- The bus:lanes=* scheme
Now, in my understanding only the last one is supported, the other two are not.
Three different tagging schemes for one situation is not that good.
lanes:psv=*or evenlanes:bus=*completely turns the:lanes-tagging around and only says how many psv-lanes there are but not where.- As the preset is about
:lanes-tagginglanes:psv=*should not be supported as it would lead to a complete mixup and the scheme is not needed at all as it is covered by:lanes
- As the preset is about
busway=*seems to be similar tocycleway=*with the same problems that the position of the lane is not clear.- The older scheme
busway=*might be supported but, yet, again we have a better working scheme, so why support the other one.
- The older scheme
comment:7 by , 6 years ago
Replying to skyper:
Three different tagging schemes for one situation is not that good.
Yes, I agree but this ticket is about mappaint not tagging.
lanes:psv=*or evenlanes:bus=*completely turns the:lanes-tagging around and only says how many psv-lanes there are but not where.
- As the preset is about
:lanes-tagginglanes:psv=*should not be supported as it would lead to a complete mixup and the scheme is not needed at all as it is covered by:lanesbusway=*seems to be similar tocycleway=*with the same problems that the position of the lane is not clear.
- The older scheme
busway=*might be supported but, yet, again we have a better working scheme, so why support the other one.
Sounds good, but in this case, there is a huge difference between logical tagging (which the mappaint style aims at) and real tagging with documented wiki. These should be consolidated somehow to avoid confusion.



According wiki:/Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes it supports: