Modify ↓
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 14 months ago
#18202 closed enhancement (invalid)
warn about highways wrongly connected to "crossing but not connected" highways (tunnels, bridges)
Reported by: | Klumbumbus | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | template_report highway tunnel bridge layer | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- load the attached file ConnectedToTunnel.osm
- validate
- no warning about the motorway connected to the secondary tunnel
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2019-10-04 00:35:55 +0200 (Fri, 04 Oct 2019) Build-Date:2019-10-04 01:30:57 Revision:15411 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (15411 en) Windows 10 64-Bit OS Build number: Windows 10 Pro 1903 (18362) Memory Usage: 1069 MB / 1820 MB (343 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_221-b11, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Screen: \Display0 1680x1050 Maximum Screen Size: 1680x1050 VM arguments: [-Djava.security.manager, -Djava.security.policy=file:<java.home>\lib\security\javaws.policy, -DtrustProxy=true, -Djnlpx.home=<java.home>\bin, -Djnlpx.origFilenameArg=C:\Program Files (x86)\josm-latest.jnlp, -Djnlpx.remove=false, -Djava.util.Arrays.useLegacyMergeSort=true, -Djnlpx.heapsize=NULL,2048m, -Djnlpx.splashport=55549, -Djnlpx.jvm=<java.home>\bin\javaw.exe] Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: + DirectUpload (35041) + HouseNumberTaggingTool (34977) + OpeningHoursEditor (34977) + PicLayer (35104) + SimplifyArea (34977) + apache-commons (35092) + apache-http (34908) + buildings_tools (34982) + editgpx (34908) + ejml (35122) + geojson (124) + imagery-xml-bounds (35100) + imagery_offset_db (34908) + jaxb (35014) + jna (34908) + jogl (1.2.3) + log4j (34908) + measurement (35051) + osm-obj-info (56) + photo_geotagging (34908) + photoadjust (35108) + reltoolbox (34977) + reverter (35084) + rex (53) + tag2link (35149) + tageditor (34977) + tagging-preset-tester (34908) + terracer (34977) + turnlanes-tagging (281) + turnrestrictions (34977) + undelete (34977) + utilsplugin2 (35098) + wikipedia (1.1.2) Tagging presets: + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/OneClick&zip=1 + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/StolpersteineLight&zip=1 + %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\TestNew\newpresets.xml + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/NewTags&zip=1 + %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\josm\core\data\defaultpresets.xml Map paint styles: + %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\josm\core\styles\standard\elemstyles.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/NewHighwayColors&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Coloured_Streets&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/HiDPISupport&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\TestNew\newicons.mapcss - %UserProfile%\Downloads\Road_Extended_JOSM_style.zip - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Modified&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Maxspeed&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/sac_scale&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/ShowID&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\PriorityRoad\PriorityRoad_1.0.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/LayerChecker&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Surface&style&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/ParkingLanes&style&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Sidewalks&style&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Cycleways&style&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Osmc&style&zip=1 - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/species/josm-preset-wheelchair/master/sidewalks_kerbs.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/LitObjects&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Lit&style&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\Tourenplanung.mapcss - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\SpecificBuildingValues\SpecificBuildingValues.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Coloured_buildings&zip=1 - https://github.com/bastik/mapcss-tools/raw/osm/mapnik2mapcss/osm-results/mapnik.zip - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\area-symbol.zip - http://www.freietonne.de/ft_icons/josm/FreieTonne_rules_presets_zip.php - http://www.openrailwaymap.org/styles/standard.zip - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/MaxspeedIcons&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/DestinationSignRelation&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/ParkingLanes&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Incline&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/PTStops&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/AdvertisingStyle&zip=1 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/qo3ai47fpv241jf/Styles_Fixme_and_Notes.zip?raw=1 - https://github.com/gmgeo/osmic-josm-style/archive/master.zip - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/hazmat&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Coloured_Suburb&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Coloured_Postcode&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/RecyclingMaterials&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\maxspeed\maxspeed_2.9_01 basierend auf 2.7_02 Zahlen.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Bench&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/PublicTransportV2&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\colourtag\colourtag_1.0.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/ColourTag&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Downloads\coloured_kerbs_style.zip - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Admin_Boundaries&zip=1 - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/species/josm-preset-traffic_sign_direction/master/direction.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Cycleways&zip=1 - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\yes-no-unset\YesNoUnset_1.0.mapcss - <josm.pref>\styles\sit.mapcss - <josm.pref>\styles\sit.mapcss - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\elemstyles\elemstyles12991.mapcss - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\elemstyles\elemstyles13125.mapcss - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\eigene styles\elemstyles\elemstyles13091.mapcss Validator rules: + https://raw.githubusercontent.com/<user.name>n-a-bauer/josm-validators/master/mtb.validator.mapcss - %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\TestNew\germ.validator.mapcss - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/CzechRepublicAddressSystem&zip=1 + %UserProfile%\Documents\OSM\TestNew\new.validator.mapcss + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/GermanySpecific&zip=1 + https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/OsmoseValidations&zip=1 Last errors/warnings: - W: Invalid plugin main version '0.1.0' in plugin microdata_scraping - E: java.io.IOException: The requested URL https://osmlab.github.io/editor-layer-index/imagery.xmlx was not found - W: No configuration settings found. Using hardcoded default values for all pools. - W: java.io.IOException: The requested URL https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/OsmoseValidations&zip=1 was not found - W: Failed to add https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/OsmoseValidations&zip=1 to tag checker - W: java.io.IOException: No file found for: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Rules/OsmoseValidations&zip=1 - W: Unable to use English input method
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
by , 6 years ago
Attachment: | ConnectedToTunnel.osm added |
---|
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
Keywords: | highway tunnel bridge layer added |
---|
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
comment:3 by , 14 months ago
Not sure why this wasn't closed. I see no problem in the attached data. Is it about node 297042366? That is just close to the tunnel only connected to the motorway.
If the node would be connected to the tunnel it would be similar to #9304 and I agree that this (modified) case should probably produce a warning.
comment:4 by , 14 months ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Similar to #9304.