Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#16249 closed enhancement
[PATCH] Imagery definitions refactor — at Version 6
Reported by: | wiktorn | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 18.05 |
Component: | Core imagery | Version: | |
Keywords: | wms wmts endpoint | Cc: | Don-vip, Klumbumbus |
Description (last modified by )
Attached patch extends imagery definitions with:
- ability to define default layers for WMS_ENDPOINT and WMTS
- ability to set custom headers from GUI
- ability to set imagery as properly georeferenced
Apart from that, with this patch comes new WMS GetCapabilities parser based on SAX.
There are also easily separated fixes for CachedFile that I came across when developing this changes:
- cache validity check
- too long paths on Windows
The long vision is to move all (or all except some crippled imagery providers that do not provide GetCapabilities service) WMS imagery definitions to WMS_ENDPOINT type.
Features yet to be developed:
- add edit option in ImageryProvidersPanel which will open prefilled GUI as when adding
- add context menu in Layers window to change layer if we use WMS_ENDPOINT / WMTS
- imagery boundary generator from Nominatim / relation geomatry
- add "copy as maps entry" which would allow to easily add new entry in josm.openstreetmap.de/maps based on user imageries
- add "copy as string" which would allow easy share of entries within community
As this is bigger change that is hard to split, any testers are welcome.
For easier review - I've created pull request on my GitHub:
https://github.com/wiktorn/josm/pull/1
You may comment there or here.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
follow-up: 5 comment:2 by , 7 years ago
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Keywords: | wms wmts endpoint added |
---|
I commented to the PR. Code is very clean, I didn't test it yet. I'd say we can give it a try once 18.04 is released. I made the remark only once but there are several public methods in different classes that must include a javadoc.
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
Priority: | normal → major |
---|
comment:5 by , 7 years ago
Replying to stoecker:
It would be very fine when these two are exchangeable, so we could do this, but I don't see that we really should do this...
I'm not sure that I understand what you have in mind here. We have wms and wms_endpoint for some time already. I do not plan to phase out support of wms type.
ability to set custom headers from GUI
ability to set imagery as properly georeferenced
I hope these are expert settings?
They are now. Added some commits to address this.
add "copy as maps entry" which would allow to easily add new entry in josm.openstreetmap.de/maps based on user imageries
There also should be a more simple way to create boundaries. I still find it rather complex with the plugin. A nice solution would be to select a relation or way and say "My image boundary". It's then stripped to the geometry, checked for consistency, shown to verify and accepted. That would be fine 😊
I guess we can use Nominatim to search for relation, fetch its geometry, and in the end - simplify geometry to reduce its size.
add "copy as string" which would allow easy share of entries within community
With boundaries I think you can forget this 😏, without an URI like format would be a good idea, so it can be easily detected and parsed at different places (E.g. Drag and Drop on main window).
Question: Long code changes I did not really look at, but why do you change a regression test file?
I moved regression file from one place to the other so folder structure is compatibile with MockServer. With this move I also converted line endings from DOS to UNIX.
comment:6 by , 7 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
It would be very fine when these two are exchangeable, so we could do this, but I don't see that we really should do this...
I hope these are expert settings?
There also should be a more simple way to create boundaries. I still find it rather complex with the plugin. A nice solution would be to select a relation or way and say "My image boundary". It's then stripped to the geometry, checked for consistency, shown to verify and accepted. That would be fine 😊
With boundaries I think you can forget this 😏, without an URI like format would be a good idea, so it can be easily detected and parsed at different places (E.g. Drag and Drop on main window).
Question: Long code changes I did not really look at, but why do you change a regression test file?