#14114 closed enhancement (fixed)
Lack of icon and warning for amenity=social_facility without social_facility=*
Reported by: | naoliv | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 16.12 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Create a node with amenity=social_facility
only.
See how there isn't any icon for the object.
Also, shouldn't JOSM issue a warning for [amenity = social_facility][!social_facility]
?
JOSM:
URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2016-12-12 02:28:14 +0100 (Mon, 12 Dec 2016) Build-Date:2016-12-12 02:35:01 Revision:11381 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (11381 pt_BR) Linux Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Memory Usage: 567 MB / 10206 MB (264 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_111-8u111-b14-3-b14, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Screen: :0.0 1600x900, :0.1 1280x1024 Maximum Screen Size: 1600x1024 Java package: openjdk-8-jre:amd64-8u111-b14-3 Java ATK Wrapper package: libatk-wrapper-java:all-0.33.3-11 VM arguments: [-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on] Dataset consistency test: No problems found
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
Component: | Core mappaint → Core validator |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 16.12 |
Type: | defect → enhancement |
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
I don't want to add an icon for a single amenity=social_facility, as this gives the impression to the mapper that the object is mapped correctly. However an amenity=social_facility without social_facility=* is pretty useless as there is a wide range of social facilities.
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
But as it is now it seems that the object is invalid or unknown.
Couldn't we have a generic social facility icon with a red question or exclamation mark?
Something that means "this object is valid but it lacks some information"
In 11398/josm: