Opened 9 years ago

Last modified 9 years ago

#13517 new enhancement

Warn users if hw=path is a lone tag — at Version 5

Reported by: openstreetmap.org-user-d1g Owned by: team
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: Core validator Version:
Keywords: Cc:

Description (last modified by openstreetmap.org-user-d1g)

If highway=path used without supplementary tags (access,sac_slace,surface,smoothness) it may mean up to 6 different things in OSM 1 2.

Similar to other unspecific values (barrier=yes and highway=road) users should be asked to enter more information about (sac_scale/surface/smoothness/access and other tags)

See also #11753.

Change History (5)

comment:1 by openstreetmap.org-user-d1g, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

comment:2 by openstreetmap.org-user-d1g, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

comment:3 by skyper, 9 years ago

I just did change a small unpaved hiking trail in the mountains from footway -> path, IMOH the opposite is much worser.

People tend to use highway=footway/cycleway in many cases where there less stricter access restrictions.

What should I map if I have a source for paths but without any physical information (e.g. Maps4BW) ?

in reply to:  3 comment:4 by openstreetmap.org-user-d1g, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

I forgot mtb:scale.

Last edited 9 years ago by openstreetmap.org-user-d1g (previous) (diff)

in reply to:  3 comment:5 by openstreetmap.org-user-d1g, 9 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

Replying to skyper:

I just did change a small unpaved hiking trail in the mountains from footway -> path, IMOH the opposite is much worser.

Still, it is not as good if was qualified with surface/visibility and other tags?

If this trail in the mountains (with rocks, cliffs and such), then it makes sense to tag it with sac_scale=* / mtb:scale=*, isn't?

What should I map if I have a source for paths but without any physical information (e.g. Maps4BW) ?

If you don't have any physical/surface information, you shouldn't enter fake/estimated values. Survey it over time and you will get complex parts of the tail (visibility, mtb:scale) or with complicated passibility (surface, smoothness).

highway=path is ambiguous without any (visibility, mtb:scale, surface, smoothness) tags.

hw=path users (myself including) trying to differentiate them from hw=footway, but exact reason "why are they different" is simply unknown if they only use single hw=path tag.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.