#12992 closed defect (fixed)
Way with waterway=dam cause false validator warning
Reported by: | mdk | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 16.06 |
Component: | Core validator | Version: | latest |
Keywords: | template_report | Cc: |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Open validateDam.osm
- validate
What is the expected result?
No warnings, because a dam as a simple way normally is a little bit wider then the water behind the dam. So the end nodes of the dam are normally not connected to other waterway=*
What happens instead?
Warning "Waterway ends without a connection to other waterway or the direction of the waterway is wrong."
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
If you copy all and past it to a new layer, validation shown no warning.
URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2016-06-17 02:58:36 +0200 (Fri, 17 Jun 2016) Build-Date:2016-06-17 01:34:23 Revision:10409 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (10409 en) Linux Ubuntu 15.10 Memory Usage: 427 MB / 876 MB (165 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_91-8u91-b14-0ubuntu4~15.10.1-b14, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK Server VM VM arguments: [-Djosm.restart=true, -Djosm.home=<josm.pref>, -Djava.net.useSystemProxies=true] Dataset consistency test: No problems found Plugins: - ColumbusCSV (32292) - FastDraw (32158) - HouseNumberTaggingTool (31926) - Mapillary (32158) - OpeningHoursEditor (32158) - RoadSigns (32177) - SimplifyArea (32158) - apache-commons (32158) - apache-http (32158) - buildings_tools (32158) - contourmerge (1014) - imagery-xml-bounds (32287) - imagery_offset_db (32158) - pbf (32290) - poly (32287) - public_transport (32158) - reltoolbox (32158) - reverter (32158) - terracer (32158) - turnlanes (32158) - turnrestrictions (32158) - utilsplugin2 (32158) Tagging presets: - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/LaneAttributes&preset&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Presets/OneClick&zip=1 Map paint styles: - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Maxspeed&zip=1 - https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Styles/Traffic_signs&zip=1 Last errors/warnings: - W: Old style SideButton usage for action org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.mapillary.gui.MapillaryMainDialog$StopAction@ded068 - W: Old style SideButton usage for action org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.mapillary.gui.MapillaryHistoryDialog$UndoAction@13eca2c - W: Old style SideButton usage for action org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.mapillary.gui.MapillaryHistoryDialog$RedoAction@e45ab2 - W: Old style SideButton usage for action org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.mapillary.gui.MapillaryFilterDialog$UpdateAction@75c1fc - W: Old style SideButton usage for action org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.mapillary.gui.MapillaryFilterDialog$ResetAction@11c1769
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
by , 8 years ago
Attachment: | validateDam.osm added |
---|
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | → 16.06 |
---|
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Wow, that was fast!!
For the second part
If you copy all and past it to a new layer, validation shown no warning.
I think I found the reason, but I will create a new ticket instead of post it here ;-)
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
I think it is even better to explicit use the wanted waterway
tags instead of applying this rule to all waterway
s with some exception because there are so much different values, we could never exlude them all to avoid false positives. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/waterway#values
In 10422/josm: