Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #12834


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2016-05-09T21:14:33+02:00 (10 years ago)
Author:
Kjarrval
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #12834 – Description

    initial v1  
    1 The validator, when testing route relations, produces the validation error "route relation contains a gap" when the ways in the relations don't connect all the way in their defined order. Since JOSM has the rule of disabling adding of duplicate members to relations, some routes cannot be fixed (within JOSM). However, the validator is perfectly willing to let relations with duplicate ways pass the validation as long as the duplicate ways were already in the server data. This creates an imbalance where the error must be left alone or the user must user another editor for that task.
     1The validator, when testing route relations, produces the validation error "route relation contains a gap" when the ways in the relations don't connect all the way in their defined order. Since JOSM has the rule of disabling adding of duplicate members to relations, some routes cannot be fixed (within JOSM). However, the validator is perfectly willing to let relations with duplicate ways pass the validation as long as the duplicate ways were already in the server data. This creates an imbalance where the error must be left alone or the user must use another editor for that task.
    22
    33There are two ways I can think of to make it more fair: