#12479 closed enhancement (wontfix)
aerialway=drag_lift
| Reported by: | geozeisig | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Internal preset | Version: | latest |
| Keywords: | template_report | Cc: | geozeisig |
Description
What steps will reproduce the problem?
- Instead of Tag:aerialway=t-bar you should use aerialway=drag_lift + aerialway:drag_lift=t-bar
- Instead of Tag:aerialway=j-bar you should use aerialway=drag_lift + aerialway:drag_lift=j-bar
- Instead of Tag:aerialway=platter you should use aerialway=drag_lift + aerialway:drag_lift=platter
Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
See Wiki-page Tag:aerialway=t-bar etc.
URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2016-02-01 23:47:27 +0100 (Mon, 01 Feb 2016) Build-Date:2016-02-02 02:32:58 Revision:9711 Relative:URL: ^/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (9711 de) Windows 7 32-Bit Memory Usage: 125 MB / 989 MB (65 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_71-b15, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM Plugins: - OpeningHoursEditor (31772) - PicLayer (31895) - buildings_tools (31895) - terracer (31895) - utilsplugin2 (32018) Last errors/warnings: - W: Invalid jar file ''C:\Users\Dieter\AppData\Roaming\JOSM\plugins\utilsplugin2.jar.new'' (exists: false, canRead: false)
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
| Component: | Core → Internal preset |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
| Status: | new → closed |
The current usage is aerialway=t-bar|j-bar|platter|rope_tow (2258+147+2916+801=6122).
Compared to aerialway:drag_lift (206)
From these 206 aerialway:drag_lift keys are 136 useless because there is either already the specific value tagged in aerialway or even both keys contradict, see this list: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/eah
There is no reason to change the tagging. Please revert your changes in the wiki.
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
I opened a thread in the forum. But there is not much resonance. So I'm probably the only one who wants to change it. So we should leave it at the old.



looks like you updated the wiki pages on your own, does this change result from a public discussion?